Supreme Court of the United States CAROL PULLIAM, Petitioner vs. USC On Petition For A Writ Of Certiorari RICHARD ISAAC FINE

  By , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Richard I Fine Petition to the Supreme Court of California For A Writ Of Certiorari

“Richard I. Fine Presents the argument against paying County or Court Supplemental or Local Judicial Benefit Payments to Judges, to the US Supreme Court.”   ========================================================================================= In The Supreme Court of the United States ——————————— ♦ ——————————— CAROL PULLIAM, Petitioner, vs. UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA, Respondent. ——————————— ♦ ——————————— On Petition For A Writ Of Certiorari To The Supreme Court Of The State Of California ——————————— ♦ ——————————— PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI ——————————— ♦ ——————————— RICHARD ISAAC FINE, ESQ. P.O. Box 789, 1187 Coast Village Rd., Ste. 1 Santa Barbara, CA 93102-0789 Telephone: (310) 622-6900 Email: richardfine@richardfinelaw.com Counsel for Petitioner Carol Pulliam ================================================================================================== COCKLE LEGAL BRIEFS (800) 225-6964 WWW.COCKLELEGALBRIEFS.COM i QUESTION PRESENTED Do state court trial judges, court of appeal justices and supreme court justices “war against the (United States) Constitution” by denying state litigants Fourteenth Amendment Constitutional due process when each and/or all these judicial officers did not disclose and recuse themselves as required by state law, state Code of Judicial Ethics and/or other state or federal requirements when he/she: (1) currently receives or in the past received payments from: (a) the county currently paying or paid the Respondent for Respondent’s services;… Read More

QUICK EASY SHARE OPTIONS PRESS + FOR MORE

Targeted Justice Files Lawsuit Alleging Crimes Against US Citizens, Is it a Bombshell or a Fizzle? by Janet Phelan

  By
Targeted Justice Files Lawsuit Alleging Crimes Against US Citizens Is it a Bombshell or a Fizzle by Janet Phelan

By Janet Phelan On January 12, 2023, Targeted Justice, which holds itself out as a resource for those who claim to be targeted with covert weaponry, filed a lawsuit in US District Court claiming that FBI head Christopher Wray and Attorney General Merrick Garland—among others—are responsible for these attacks on selected US citizens. The lawsuit cites the “Havana Syndrome” and at least one of the plaintiffs, a Dr. Len Ber, has been cited elsewhere as a “Havana Syndrome” victim. The “Havana Syndrome” has been widely covered by legacy media. It refers to what has been termed as “mysterious” attacks on CIA and Embassy officials in China, Cuba and elsewhere — attacks which have been in some cases profoundly disabling. The causes of the “Syndrome” remain in dispute, with some attributing them to covert directed energy and/or microwave attacks. As it now stands, the US government has passed a law recognizing and giving medical assistance to diplomats and officials who have been attacked in this manner. The US government continues to maintain the stance that other than the vetted officials, no US citizen is being attacked with this weaponry. At this… Read More

QUICK EASY SHARE OPTIONS PRESS + FOR MORE

“Kaiser Permanente Dr. Syed Maksudul Hossain, Please Don’t Let my Friend Die”

  By , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Los Angeles California Kaiser Permanente physician Doctor Doctor Syed Maksudul Hossain

By Janet Phelan No, this cry is not coming from Auschwitz, where Dr. Mengele regularly killed people whose “lives were not worth living.” Dr. Syed Hossain is ostensibly not a dedicated murderer, although after reading this article you may have your doubts. But like Dr. Mengele, Dr. Hossain is functioning in a system which increasingly disregards the sanctity of human life and often grants immunity to medical professionals for depraved acts of negligence. “Scott C.” was sent to a nursing home in Los Angeles following an evaluation at White Memorial Hospital which revealed he had hydrocephalus, a condition that may be caused by a blow to the head and is treatable through surgical intervention. A shunt is placed in the head in order to drain off the fluid. However, the attending doctor at White Memorial, a Dr. Ho, did not suggest any treatment for Scott, who at age 70 was experiencing effects of what is colloquially termed “water on the brain.” The effects include memory loss and gait problems. Without treatment, the prognosis is dim and he can expect increasing memory and gait issues, culminating in death. A Dr. Syed… Read More

QUICK EASY SHARE OPTIONS PRESS + FOR MORE

HELP PROVE THE PATTERN OF COURT VICTIM ABUSE, GET ADDED

  By , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Help Prove the Pattern of Judicial Abuse by adding your abuse case to the National Court Victim Database

GET YOUR ABUSE LISTED NOW, DON’T LET THE JUDGES HIDE THEIR CRIMES You can make a difference, share this post by using the share options. Make sure your Judicial Abuse case gets listed by County and State. List your info anonymously or in detail so fellow victims and activists and help network you with the other nationwide court victims. CLICK HERE TO ADD YOUR CASE NOW Join the Community of COURT VICTIMS HERE NOW It’s a fact that judges hide bribery, fraud, denial of due process and fraud upon the court in every city and state in America. Los Angeles Dr. Richard I. Fine proved that over 90% of California judges are accepting bribes to not rule in favor. The government and law enforcement do nothing to protect the public. The FBI and DOJ ignore millions of victims every year to allow the judges and lawyers to profit from the lack of accountability and prosecution. Check out Reuters Investigative story on how judges are never prosecuted “Absolute Power Corrupts absolutely” SEE THE TEFLON ROBE by Reuters Check out HOW EASY IT IS TO BRIBE A JUDGE & HOW TO RESEARCH… Read More

QUICK EASY SHARE OPTIONS PRESS + FOR MORE

STOP JUDGE DONNA D. GECK FROM HARMING CHILDREN, DENYING DUE PROCESS & VIOLATING OF CIVIL RIGHTS

  By , , , , ,
STOP SANTA BARBARA COUNTY CALIFORNIA JUDGE DONNA D GECK FROM HARMING CHILDREN, DENYING DUE PROCESS & VIOLATING OF CIVIL RIGHTS

STOP JUDGE DONNA D. GECK FROM DENYING DUE PROCESS Fit mother denied any contact for over 600 days with her 5-year-old twins violating civil rights under the color of law, placing children with Father with prior murder conviction, 5 DUI arrests, history of domestic violence with 3 counts of battery charges. This is a Call to Action to remove Judge Donna Geck from the bench of the Santa Barbara County Superior Court, as she is harming children and denying due process. Judge Geck is a Judicial Officer for the Anacapa Division, Santa Barbara California, who has a plethora of complaints against her rulings in the cases she oversees: Civil, Criminal, Family Law, Juvenile, Probate, Appeals, and Small Claims. The 3-year-old twins (now 5) were placed in full custody of the father when mother requested permission to the court to move with the children to the next county 30 miles away. Geck did not grant the move away. Geck had full knowledge of the father’s criminal history when she placed the children with the father full time. Geck then denied an evidentiary hearing when requested by the mother to regain her… Read More

QUICK EASY SHARE OPTIONS PRESS + FOR MORE

Cook County Chicago Illinois County Judge Shauna L Boliker exposed for possible bribery

  By , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Cook County Chicago Illinois County Judge shauna louise boliker and Lisa Casanova Public Guardian exposed for possible bribery

COOK COUNTY RECORDER HIDES JUDGE SHAUNA L. BOLIKER’S LOANS Following the disclosure of Judge Shauna L. Boliker’s considerable loan history, with concerns voiced that these loans are in fact a vehicle for bribery, the Cook County Recorder has now made this information unavailable. You can read the initial article containing the data on these loans here Today’s search, again using her husband’s name, came up with NOTHING! NONE of the hits relate to the appropriate party! Back Search : Name: Andrews David M Total Documents : 6 Click the boxes to select your documents before adding to the cart. You may remove documents from your cart by clicking the “Shopping Cart”, which is located in the upper right corner of the page. Buy Documents Buy Search Result (No Images) View DocDoc Number Doc RecordedDoc ExecutedDoc TypeConsi. Amt.1st Grantor1st GranteeAssoc. Doc#1st PIN View22213213518/1/20227/28/2022RELEASEMORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEMS INCANDREWS MARK DAVID200155710317-17-235-019-1138 933 W VAN BUREN ST, CHICAGO View 22209420227/28/20227/11/2022WARRANTY DEED$375,000.00ANDREWS MARK DAVIDTRUONG NORMA E17-17-235-019-1138 933 W VAN BUREN ST, CHICAGOView20036060302/5/20201/31/2020RELEASEMORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEMS INCANDREWS MARK DAVID190744902617-17-235-019-1138 933 W VAN BUREN ST, CHICAGO View 20015571031/15/20201/7/2020MORTGAGE$306,000.00ANDREWS MARK DAVIDMORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEMS INC222132135117-17-235-019-1138 933 W VAN… Read More

QUICK EASY SHARE OPTIONS PRESS + FOR MORE

Court Gate Divorced from the Law By Elaine Mickman

  By , , , , ,
Court Gate Book Divorced from the law Elaine Mickman

Author Elaine Mickman Victim Elaine Mickman Abusers: Judge(s) Lawyers(s) Basic Story: What happens when there’s a “tale of too much corruption” and the judiciary doesn’t apply the law? departs from law?… doesn’t comply with the law?…..abandons the Constitution and law?….inserts their own law?….This true memoir reports the experiences of an unsuspecting woman who encountered court cases where the judiciary was “divorced from the law”. After the court system “asset-stripped” this woman and “perfected injustice”, the court ordered-away and canceled-out her Constitutional Rights to silence her and censor her cases plagued with fraud and “cover-ups” by “gatekeeping” her court-access, amounting to nothing less than a “judicial-hit-job.” The book is intended to inform and educate the public, and “sound an alarm” to prompt positive reform. Detailed version: Elaine Mickan’s Book “Divorced From the Law” Read More

QUICK EASY SHARE OPTIONS PRESS + FOR MORE

How to Research Your Judge Course January 2023

  By , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Phelan Janet Court Victim Community Course HOW TO RESEARCH YOUR JUDGE 2023

HOW TO RESEARCH YOUR JUDGE 2023 28 January class Please contact me if interested. Here is another case where this research had a profound effect. Justice in the Time of Corona – Activist Post (SEE BELOW) Justice in the Time of Corona – Activist Post The first class for 2023 on HOW TO RESEARCH YOUR JUDGE will be held on January 28 at 2 pm Central Time. As we continue to reel under judicial oppression, with ostensibly no legal recourse, this research has proven, time and time again, to make an impact in cases where judges are ignoring the law and the human and civil rights of litigants. The class remains at the very low registration fee of $30. If you are unable to pay that, please contact me directly as fee waivers are available. We need an army of people doing this research, which can show that judges are compromised and are throwing cases and being paid off, under the table, to do so. This is not justice. This is a charade of justice. Please join us on January 28 and start to make a difference in your case,… Read More

QUICK EASY SHARE OPTIONS PRESS + FOR MORE

THE TWELVE PRESUMPTIONS OF COURT

  By , , , ,

Exhibit # 001-1 THE TWELVE PRESUMPTIONS OF COURT All shall be considered rebutted Canon 3228 A Roman Court does not operate according to any true rule of law, but by presumptions of the law. Therefore, if presumptions presented by the private Bar Guild are not rebutted they become fact and are therefore said to stand true [Or as “truth in commerce”]. There are twelve (12) key presumptions asserted by the private Bar Guilds which if unchallenged stand true being Public Record, Public Service, Public Oath, Immunity, Summons, Custody, Court of Guardians, Court of Trustees, Government as Executor/Beneficiary, Executor De Son Tort, Incompetence, and Guilt: 1. The Presumption of Public Record is that any matter brought before a lower Roman Courts is a matter for the public record when in fact it is presumed by the members of the private Bar Guild that the matter is a private Bar Guild business matter. Unless openly rebuked and rejected by stating clearly the matter is to be on the Public Record, the matter remains a private Bar Guild matter completely under private Bar Guild rules; and 2. The Presumption of Public Service is… Read More

QUICK EASY SHARE OPTIONS PRESS + FOR MORE

ACFE When Caretakers Empty the Coffers: A Look at Guardianship Fraud By Brett Darken

  By

In nearly every state, guardians are considered fiduciaries. As such, they have a duty to act in their clients’ best financial interests. Sadly, that’s not always the case Anti-fraud professionals know that fraudsters often target victims when they’re most vulnerable. When people are processing strong emotions — like dealing with the mental or physical decline of a family member — it’s easy to ignore red flags that something’s amiss. During these times courts may appoint a guardian with the idea that an impartial third-party is better equipped to handle the financial responsibilities involved with taking care of an incapacitated individual. Unfortunately, in some cases, this can open the door for fraudsters to commit fiduciary fraud. Guardianships Guardianship can be ordered by a judge when they determine that a person is unable care for their own affairs. The judge orders an independent guardian, or conservator, to oversee and look out for the well-being of the person who can’t care for themselves. Guardianships frequently involve the elderly, or adults who have some form of dementia or mental incapacitation, but as demonstrated in the recent Brittany Spears case that garnered worldwide media attention,… Read More

QUICK EASY SHARE OPTIONS PRESS + FOR MORE

HELP Stop the forced Dangerous Haldol Drugging of a Mother fighting for her children

  By , , , , , , ,
Elizabeth Harding Weinstein drugged to death

December 12 2022 Haloperidol is a typical antipsychotic drug. This drug is still widely used in emergency medicine, psychiatry, and general medicine departments. It is mostly used for acute confusional state, psychotic disorders, agitation, delirium, and aggressive behaviour. Overdose of haloperidol can cause sudden deaths. Cardiopulmonary arrest related to use of haloperidol had been reported in literature as case reports but are very few. No such cases have been reported in India till now. We report a case of cardiac arrest due to the use of haloperidol. Case number is 900327-22 Elizabeth Harding Weinstein More on Elizabeth Harding Weinstein Court Watch: Lizzie to be Involuntarily Drugged Virtual Hearing (apparently) Open to Public Who: Elizabeth Harding Weinstein What: Hearing in New York Court to order her to be drugged over her objection When: Monday, December 12, 2022 at 10:30 AM EST / 7:30 AM PST Where: LIVE STREAM LINK. Passcode: 1212. Below is from Barbara Stone via email: Background: As many of you know, Lizzie Harding Weinstein was falsely incarcerated using a void illegal ‘restraining order”. The void order had expired but as we know, our country is lawless. So now,… Read More

QUICK EASY SHARE OPTIONS PRESS + FOR MORE

Oaths, Laws, Codes, Bills & Legal Canons are useless because no one enforces anything

  By , , ,
Oaths, Laws, Codes, Bills & Legal Canons are useless because no one enforces anything

This is the current oath for judges per 28 U.S. Code § 453 I, ___ ___, do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will administer justice without respect to persons, and do equal right to the poor and to the rich, and that I will faithfully and impartially discharge and perform all the duties incumbent upon me as ___ under the Constitution and laws of the United States. So help me God. The oath was amended in Public Law 101-650 of Dec 1, 1990 ( Judicial Improvements Act of 1990) in Sec. 404. And here is the oath before the amendment (emphasis added): “I, ___ ___, do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will administer justice without respect to persons, and do equal right to the poor and to the rich, and that I will faithfully and impartially discharge and perform all the duties incumbent upon me as …. “”___ according to the best of my abilities and understanding, agreeably to the Constitution and laws of the United States. So help me God.”” Judicial Code of Ethics Read More

QUICK EASY SHARE OPTIONS PRESS + FOR MORE

TODAY OUR CHOICE IS: (1) VOTE “NO”; or (2) CONTINUE TO LIVE UNDER A CORRUPT JUDICIAL SYSTEM!

  By , , , , , , , , , ,
Vote no or live under a corrupt judicial system Governor Gavin Newsom did not support Los Angeles California Dr Richard I Fine bill amend SBX 2 11 to hold judges accountable

CALIFORNIA VOTERS GUIDE TO STOP JUDICIAL CORRUPTION ON 11/8/2022 THIS IS YOUR ONLY OPPORTUNITY TO DIRECTLY END CALIFORNIA’S JUDICIAL CORRUPTION. VOTE “NO” TO EVERY CALIFORNIA SUPREME COURT AND COURT OF APPEAL JUSTICE SEEKING RE-ELECTION. VOTE AGAINST EVERY CALIFORNIA SUPERIOR COURT JUDGE SEEKING RE-ELECTION IN EVERY COUNTY VOTE AGAINST THE GOVERNOR AND EVERY INCUMBANT LEGISLATOR SEEKING RE-ELECTION. Richard I. Fine, Doctor of Law, Ph.D. Law (International Law), Chmn. Campaign for Judicial Integrity; Co Chmn. Judicial Reform Comm., DivorceCorp. explains: “Since the mid 1980s, California counties and Superior Courts have paid approximately 90% of the California Superior Court judges “supplemental or local judicial benefits” in addition to the judges State compensation. These payments are over $400 million. The Superior Court judges receiving the payments became California Court of Appeal and California Supreme Court justices corrupting the entire California judicial system.” Fine continued: “In 2008 the California Courts held the payments violated Article 6, Section 19 of the California Constitution. The judges responded by hiring a lobbyist who engineered the enactment of SBX 2 11. SBX 211 made the payments temporally legal and gave California retroactive immunity from criminal prosecution, civil liability and… Read More

QUICK EASY SHARE OPTIONS PRESS + FOR MORE

End California’s Judicial Corruption before the November 8, 2022 General Election. Here’s How!

  By , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Help pass Los Angeles California Dr Richard I Fine bill amend SBX 2 11 Help stop the corruption

The History and Effect of California’s Judicial Corruption In 1985, Los Angeles County started paying California Superior Court Judges sitting on the State of California Superior Court for the County of Los Angeles “supplemental judicial benefits” in addition to the judges’ State of California Compensation. In 1988, Los Angeles County Supervisors justified the payments stating they were necessary to “attract and retain qualified people to serve as judges on the LA Superior Court.” On its face, such explanation doesn’t make sense. Paying a sitting judge, a “supplemental judicial benefit” will not retain him/her in office as he/she must face an election to retain his/her judicial office. It will not recruit a judge as the judge is already in office. Nor does it appear that over time the Los Angeles County “Supplemental Judicial Benefits” attracted more successful, experienced private lawyers to apply to be politically appointed for judgeships or to run for judgeships more than the usual government lawyers such as deputy district attorneys, deputy public defenders, county counsels and state employees. The real reason for the Los Angeles County “Supplemental Judicial Benefits” payments was to increase the compensation of the… Read More

QUICK EASY SHARE OPTIONS PRESS + FOR MORE

California Has a $97.5 Billion Budget Surplus and Refuses to Compensate Its Victims of Judicial Misconduct and Judicial Abuse of Power

  By
Los Angeles California Dr Richard I Fine bill amend SBX 2 11 anyone who does not support this bill is part of the corruption

I. Introduction. California is in a Judicial Corruption Crisis, and has been, since the mid to late 1980s when Los Angeles County began paying “supplemental or local judicial benefits” to California State Superior judges sitting on the California State Superior Court for the County of Los Angeles. This crisis has been exasperated by the California Legislature’s failure to resolve the crisis despite the Court’s ruling it was the Legislature’s constitutional responsibility on two occasions in 2011 and 2015. This 2022 California legislative session, the California Legislature was presented with: (1) a draft Bill Amending SBX 2 11 and related Government Code Sections; Establishing State of California Commission on Judicial Oversight and Victims Compensation for Judicial Misconduct and Judicial Abuse of Power; and (2) an immediate method to enact the Legislation by “Floor Amendment”. The Legislature refused to act prior to the 2022 session ending on August 31, 2022. This article will discuss: (1) The Historic Judicial Corruption Problem created by County and Court Payments to California State Superior Court Judges; (2) The Present State of California’s Judicial Corruption; (3) The Failure of the California Legislature to Resolve the Judicial Corruption… Read More

QUICK EASY SHARE OPTIONS PRESS + FOR MORE

Groundbreaking Legislation Proposed to Address Judicial Corruption in California

  By
Janet Phelan Groundbreaking Legislation Proposed to Address Judicial Corruption in California Dr Richard I Fines Amend SBX 2 11

By Janet Phelan A piece of legislation, revolutionary in its implications, has been drafted and is now in the process of seeking sponsorship in the California Legislature. Drafted by Richard I. Fine, a former prosecutor for the U.S. Department of Justice, founder and chief of the first municipal antitrust division in the U.S. and Special Counsel to the Governmental Efficiency Committee of the Los Angeles City Council, the legislation contains the quiet potential of massively disrupting the court corruption that is now endemic to California Superior Courts. Fine knows about this corruption first hand. In pursuit of confronting a situation in California where state Superior Court judges were receiving “extra monies and benefits” from the counties while hearing cases in which the counties were a party, Fine was summarily jailed on a contempt of court charge in 2010 and left to rot in solitary confinement in Los Angeles County Jail. Fine stuck to his principles and sat it out. He was jailed for a total of 18 months. Summarizing Fine’s plight, Tulanelink wrote, “By law, the judicial salaries of California’s Superior Court judges are set and financed by the state…. Read More

QUICK EASY SHARE OPTIONS PRESS + FOR MORE