• Help Document the Epidemic of Judicial Abuse Victims

Corrupt fiduciary/conservator Jeffery Siegel

Fiduciary Jeffery Siegel COURT VICTIM COMMENT: As far as we know, he is not a lawyer. He is a professional fiduciary/conservator operating in the Probate courts. He has a private company that provides so-called fiduciary, conservator and trustee services. His website is at : Siegel & Associates He has been operating for many years in the courts. It seems that he is well-connected with the judges in the Stanley Mosk Courthouse. This is more evidence of a Probate Racketeering Enterprise in Violation of The RICO Act:  Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations (RICO) Act. Under the Color of Authority of Probate Judges! His list of services includes: Legal protections & Financial assistance The only thing this guy protects is himself, and he will only assist himself in stealing your finances! One interesting thing about his business website is that his name is not mentioned at all! We need a full investigation of this criminal I think Rudy Giuliani  should agree with me:  https://www.msnbc.com/opinion/msnbc-opinion/sad-irony-fani-willis-flipping-rico-statute-rudy-giuliani-rcna100294 https://www.msnbc.com/opinion/msnbc-opinion/trump-georgia-racketeering-rico-charge-meaning-rcna99755 Be sure to help warn other victims by posting your review to YELP (Click the image above or this link) Add your GOOGLE Review and help warn… Read More


Support this Bill to GET JUSTICE for ALL COURT VICTIMS Nationwide

Support this Dr Richard I Fine Los Angeles County California Corrupt Members ignores judicial corruption victims

History of SBX 211 and AB 2960 SBX 2 11 Commencing in the mid to late 1980s California Counties and State Superior Courts began paying State Superior Court judges (Trial Court judges) payments in addition to their State Compensation. These payments were called “Supplemental or Local Judicial Benefit Payments” (payments). California Constitution, Article VI, Section 19, required Judicial State Compensation could only be set by the California Legislature. The payments were held to violate the California Constitution in Sturgeon v. County of Los Angeles, 167 Cal.App.4th 630 (2008), Review Denied, 2009). In response, the California Legislature approved and Governor Schwarzenegger signed SBX 2 11 on February 20, 2009, Effective May 20, 2009: (1) allowing the payments to continue in Section 2 and adding such as Section 68220 to the California Government Code; (2) defining the payments to include salary, compensation, benefits 401K and 457K plans in Section 3 and adding such as Section 68221 to the California Government Code; (3) stating nothing in SBX 2 11 requires the Judicial Council to pay for judicial benefits or previous benefits in Section 4 and adding such as Section 68222 to the California… Read More


    Help Document the Epidemic of Judicial Abuse Victims List or find Ugly Judges, abusers and court victims Help Document the Epidemic of Judicial Abuse Victims Help Document the Epidemic of Judicial Abuse Victims