What Michael Sussmans Law is about?

Recall San Diego Judge Kenneth KSo Michael Sussman 1994 2018

I created a petition to Recall San Diego Judge Kenneth K. So. It will be sent to The California State House, The California State Senate, and 3 others. ​ Michael Sussman (1994-2018) It’s Time to Take Action and Fight Back Against San Diego’s Corrupt Judicial System, which caused the covert murder of Michael Sussman. There were a series of unlawful aggressive violent acts without limit imposed upon Michael Sussman by the San Diego police department, City Attorney’s office, some judicial officials, i.e. Judge Pollack, Judge So, and Michael’s own attorneys as well that equaled collusion and corruption. Michael Sussman was a victim of retaliation. His mother, Nancy Sussman, is an Attorney that specializes in medical malpractice. She is known for being a courtroom whistleblower and who will take corrupt officials tries to hold them accountable. As a result of this whistleblowing, Michael Sussman became a target. He was beaten, falsely imprisoned, and harassed for two years before it consumed him. We are here to tell Michael’s story and expose the truth about what is really going on in the San Diego judicial system. We are here to give Michael a voice. They may think they have won the battle, but we are here to fight the war. I created a petition to Recall San Diego Judge Kenneth K. So. It will be sent to The California State House, The California State Senate, and 3 others. It’s Time to Take Action and Fight Back Against San Diego’s Corrupt Judicial System, which caused the covert murder of Michael Sussman. What Michael Sussmans Law is about: Michael was targeted by the SDPD, profiled with false charges, false police reports. This is an excess force to the point of terrorism. The City attorney charged… Read More

QUICK EASY SHARE OPTIONS PRESS + FOR MORE

Support this Bill to GET JUSTICE for ALL COURT VICTIMS Nationwide

Support this Dr Richard I Fine Los Angeles County California Corrupt Members ignores judicial corruption victims

History of SBX 211 and AB 2960 SBX 2 11 Commencing in the mid to late 1980s California Counties and State Superior Courts began paying State Superior Court judges (Trial Court judges) payments in addition to their State Compensation. These payments were called “Supplemental or Local Judicial Benefit Payments” (payments). California Constitution, Article VI, Section 19, required Judicial State Compensation could only be set by the California Legislature. The payments were held to violate the California Constitution in Sturgeon v. County of Los Angeles, 167 Cal.App.4th 630 (2008), Review Denied, 2009). In response, the California Legislature approved and Governor Schwarzenegger signed SBX 2 11 on February 20, 2009, Effective May 20, 2009: (1) allowing the payments to continue in Section 2 and adding such as Section 68220 to the California Government Code; (2) defining the payments to include salary, compensation, benefits 401K and 457K plans in Section 3 and adding such as Section 68221 to the California Government Code; (3) stating nothing in SBX 2 11 requires the Judicial Council to pay for judicial benefits or previous benefits in Section 4 and adding such as Section 68222 to the California Government Code. At all times, the payments violated both California and federal Criminal laws as “bribes” under California Criminal law and 18 U.S.C. Section 1346- “the intangible right to honest services” under Federal law. SBX 2 11 addressed the California violations in Section 5 with retroactive immunity as follows: “Notwithstanding any other law, no governmental entity, or officer or employee of a governmental entity, shall incur any liability or be subject to prosecution or disciplinary action because of benefits provided to a judge under the official action of a governmental entity prior to the effective date of this act on… Read More

QUICK EASY SHARE OPTIONS PRESS + FOR MORE