Who is Dr. Richard I. Fine? Richard I. Fine, (Doctor of Law; Ph.D Law-International Law). He is a patriot and lawyer (presently qualified to practice before the United States Supreme Court). He was disbarred from California and “unlawfully incarcerated in solitary coercive confinement without charges being made” for 18 months in the Los Angeles County jail in retaliation for exposing (Dishonorable) Judge David Paul Yafee #29399 and all of the Los Angeles County Superior court judges for accepting unlawful payments/bribes from the county. These payments resulted in literally no one winning a case against the county when a judge made the decision. Dr. Richard I. Fine FULL BIO His Amend SBX 2 11 Legislation that can stop judges from getting away with legally accepting bribes (from tax payer’s funds) awarded by those in charge Dr. Richard I. Fine Videos Richard I. FINE – part 1 Richard Fine, a Champion for Justice, Part 1 Why Won’t the ACLU Help Jailed Attorney Richard Fine? #556 Trailer Interview: Richard Fine with Bill Windsor of Lawless America Family Law Report – Richard Fine Part 2: Miscarriage of Justice & Abuse of Power Richard Fine Knocks Off Another Judge #VB98 Richard Fine: His Darkest Moment in the LA County Jail #580-581 Trailer Richard FINE reveals HOW to fight Corrupt Judges The Imprisonment of Attorney Richard I. Fine Attorney Jailed Denied Rights for Exposing Judicial Corruption, Richard Fine California Richard Fine Teaches the Public How to Fight Corruption (5 of 5) National Safe Child Show-Richard Fine-Attorney Disbarred for Exposing Corruption in the Courts Richard Fine, an Anti-Corruption Champion, Part 1 of 2 Richard Fine, an Anti-Corruption Champion, Part 2 of 2 Free Richard I. Fine! Family Law Report – Richard Fine Part 1: Judicial Bribery &… Read More
The History and Effect of California’s Judicial Corruption In 1985, Los Angeles County started paying California Superior Court Judges sitting on the State of California Superior Court for the County of Los Angeles “supplemental judicial benefits” in addition to the judges’ State of California Compensation. In 1988, Los Angeles County Supervisors justified the payments stating they were necessary to “attract and retain qualified people to serve as judges on the LA Superior Court.” On its face, such explanation doesn’t make sense. Paying a sitting judge, a “supplemental judicial benefit” will not retain him/her in office as he/she must face an election to retain his/her judicial office. It will not recruit a judge as the judge is already in office. Nor does it appear that over time the Los Angeles County “Supplemental Judicial Benefits” attracted more successful, experienced private lawyers to apply to be politically appointed for judgeships or to run for judgeships more than the usual government lawyers such as deputy district attorneys, deputy public defenders, county counsels and state employees. The real reason for the Los Angeles County “Supplemental Judicial Benefits” payments was to increase the compensation of the individual members of the Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors. Article II, Section 4 of the Los Angeles County Charter states in relevant part: “They [Board of Supervisors] shall each receive as compensation for their services a salary, payable monthly from the County Treasury, which shall be the same as that now or hereafter prescribed by law for a judge of the Superior Court in and for the County of Los Angeles,”. Other counties and Superior Courts followed Los Angeles County In 2008, such payments were held to be unconstitutional under Article VI, Section 19 of the California Constitution, in… Read More
