Category: Legislation

Corrupt Lawyer Darrell Steven Steinberg

Darrell Steven Steinberg #114583 License Status: Active Address: City of Sacramento – Office of the Mayor, 915 I St Fl 5, Sacramento, CA 95814-2622 Phone: 916-808-5882 License Status, Disciplinary and Administrative History All changes of license status due to nondisciplinary administrative matters and disciplinary actions. Date License Status Discipline Administrative Action Darrel Steven Steinberg wrote illegal SBX211 in 2009 making it legal for California Judges to accept bribes as well retroactively Present Active 12/3/1984 Admitted to the State Bar of California Darrell Steinberg is Mayor of Sacramento, California. Steinberg took office December 13, 2016. Steinberg’s term ends December 15, 2024. Darrell Steinberg ran for re-election as Mayor of Sacramento, California. Darrell Steinberg won the general election March 3, 2020. Before becoming mayor, Darrell Steinberg served as a Democrat for California State Senate, representing District 6, 2006 to 2014. He served as president pro tempore from 2008 to 2014 in the Senate. Darrell Steinberg served as a member of California State Assembly, 1998 to 2004. As a member of the California State Legislature, Darrell Steinberg authored Proposition 63, Mental Health Services Act, which voters approved in 2004, imposed 1 percent income tax on personal income in excess of $1 million funding California Department of Mental Health’s programs U.S. Senate See: United States Senate election California, 2016 Darrell Steinberg initially considered a candidate in the 2016 election for U.S. Senate, representing California. However, he endorsed Kamala Harris February 5, 2015. REPEAL SBX211 AND GIVE THE COURTS BACK TO THE PEOPLE Retro active immunity is unconstitutional SECTION FROM SBX211 This bill would provide that no governmental entity, or officer or employee of a governmental entity, shall incur any liability or be subject to prosecution or disciplinary action because of benefits provided to a… Read More

QUICK EASY SHARE OPTIONS PRESS + FOR MORE

Support this Bill to GET JUSTICE for ALL COURT VICTIMS Nationwide

  By , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Support this Dr Richard I Fine Los Angeles County California Corrupt Members ignores judicial corruption victims

History of SBX 211 and AB 2960 SBX 2 11 Commencing in the mid to late 1980s California Counties and State Superior Courts began paying State Superior Court judges (Trial Court judges) payments in addition to their State Compensation. These payments were called “Supplemental or Local Judicial Benefit Payments” (payments). California Constitution, Article VI, Section 19, required Judicial State Compensation could only be set by the California Legislature. The payments were held to violate the California Constitution in Sturgeon v. County of Los Angeles, 167 Cal.App.4th 630 (2008), Review Denied, 2009). In response, the California Legislature approved and Governor Schwarzenegger signed SBX 2 11 on February 20, 2009, Effective May 20, 2009: (1) allowing the payments to continue in Section 2 and adding such as Section 68220 to the California Government Code; (2) defining the payments to include salary, compensation, benefits 401K and 457K plans in Section 3 and adding such as Section 68221 to the California Government Code; (3) stating nothing in SBX 2 11 requires the Judicial Council to pay for judicial benefits or previous benefits in Section 4 and adding such as Section 68222 to the California Government Code. At all times, the payments violated both California and federal Criminal laws as “bribes” under California Criminal law and 18 U.S.C. Section 1346- “the intangible right to honest services” under Federal law. SBX 2 11 addressed the California violations in Section 5 with retroactive immunity as follows: “Notwithstanding any other law, no governmental entity, or officer or employee of a governmental entity, shall incur any liability or be subject to prosecution or disciplinary action because of benefits provided to a judge under the official action of a governmental entity prior to the effective date of this act on… Read More

QUICK EASY SHARE OPTIONS PRESS + FOR MORE