Mariposa California Corruption The Jerry Cox Story how stealing land in court is made legal

Mariposa County Corruption Jerry Cox

THE MARIPOSA COUNTY CORRUPTION CASE OF JERRY COX Help this good man fight to get his home back! False accuser, Ashley K. Harris, “CRIES WOLF” and says that she was “KIDNAPPED” at this Cabin in the Woods in Mariposa County, California for 3 days and RAPED! Where Ashley resides, a female judge, in San Luis Obispo Superior Court sees through her web of lies, CASE DISMISSED! Back in Mariposa County, the innocent accused man, Jerry Cox, had to pay $500,000 bail, and $100,000+ in attorney fees to bring justice to the surface against 15 felonies on phony rape and kidnapping charges and now is on the brink of loosing everything! How? Mariposa County Officials retaliated by manipulating their backwoods court to sell his home, business, and life savings for the sole purposes to remove him out of their community in reach for their personal and financial gains. Before paying a $500,000 bail, Jerry Cox was arrested and behind bars for 30 days on these false “KIDNAPPING and RAPE charges! This is when the Mariposa Sheriff’s Department came out to his home and “SHOT” in cold blood his beloved furry family member dogs “Arrow”, “BoBo” and “Lit’l Duke! After arming guards at Jerry’s home for no reason and rendering him homeless for 2 years, his very own County authorities mocked and bullied what they have done to this innocent man after everything he was already going through. Below is just one example out of many! Our goal is to raise funds to continue the fight against Mariposa County and their corrupt government officials who believe they can act with impunity and charge the innocent with heinous crimes and take life, liberty and property all because someone dared to challenge the authorities… Read More

QUICK EASY SHARE OPTIONS PRESS + FOR MORE

RULES OF PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT Chapter 1 Lawyer-Client Relationship Rules 1.1 – 1.18

Rule 1.1 Competence (a) A lawyer shall not intentionally, recklessly, with gross negligence, or repeatedly fail to perform legal services with competence. (b) For purposes of this rule, “competence” in any legal service shall mean to apply the (i) learning and skill, and (ii) mental, emotional, and physical ability reasonably* necessary for the performance of such service. (c) If a lawyer does not have sufficient learning and skill when the legal services are undertaken, the lawyer nonetheless may provide competent representation by (i) associating with or, where appropriate, professionally consulting another lawyer whom the lawyer reasonably believes* to be competent, (ii) acquiring sufficient learning and skill before performance is required, or (iii) referring the matter to another lawyer whom the lawyer reasonably believes* to be competent. (d) In an emergency a lawyer may give advice or assistance in a matter in which the lawyer does not have the skill ordinarily required if referral to, or association or consultation with, another lawyer would be impractical. Assistance in an emergency must be limited to that reasonably* necessary in the circumstances. Comment [1] This rule addresses only a lawyer’s responsibility for his or her own professional competence. See rules 5.1 and 5.3 with respect to a lawyer’s disciplinary responsibility for supervising subordinate lawyers and nonlawyers. [2] See rule 1.3 with respect to a lawyer’s duty to act with reasonable* diligence. Rule 1.2 Scope of Representation and Allocation of Authority (a) Subject to rule 1.2.1, a lawyer shall abide by a client’s decisions concerning the objectives of representation and, as required by rule 1.4, shall reasonably* consult with the client as to the means by which they are to be pursued. Subject to Business and Professions Code section 6068, subdivision (e)(1) and rule 1.6,… Read More

QUICK EASY SHARE OPTIONS PRESS + FOR MORE