case in bankruptcy that “trustee” violates indentured servitude doctrine under 13th amendment

case-re-involuntary-servitude.pdf The highly corrupt 11th circuit federal court of appeals just issued a half baked opinion conceding that the appointment of a trustee in bankruptcy may violate the indentured servitude clause of the 13th amendment. See attached. Instead of deciding that issue, the clowns in the 11th circuit sent it back to the bankruptcy color of law judge to address. So that case will be in the perpetual spin cycle, going up and down the court tiers till the of time as is the intention to keep the fee train running. In any event, it is an outstanding argument to use in the guardian cartel… the appointment of a psychopath in the guise of a “guardian” constitutes indentured servitude and illegally obstructs the “standing” of their captured slave. I will start to incorporate the indentured servitude count in our filings. I will get back to those separately who have not provided their affidavits. I can only include those who have provided affidavits in the next round of litigation. Please get this done!!!! Barbara Read More

QUICK EASY SHARE OPTIONS PRESS + FOR MORE

Attorney Immunity Bars Claims for Fraud and Conversion

A state supreme court recently held that attorneys can assert immunity as a defense to claims such as fraud and conversion if the conduct in question is in furtherance of client representation. ABA Section of Litigation leaders see a trend in multiple states upholding the doctrine of attorney immunity. They caution, however, that there are limits to the doctrine and that it should not be considered a “license to misbehave.” The plaintiff sued the defense attorney for fraud and conversion for mishandling evidence of allegedly faulty brakes Bethel v. Quilling A plaintiff’s husband died in a car accident while towing a trailer. The plaintiff sued the trailer’s manufacturer, alleging that faulty brakes caused the accident. Counsel for the manufacturer disassembled and tested the brakes during the course of discovery, but before plaintiff’s counsel had an opportunity to examine them. The plaintiff then sued the defense attorney (and firm) from the personal injury case for, among other things, fraud and conversion in connection with their handling of the evidence. The trial court in the second case, Bethel v. Quilling, granted the defendants’ motion to dismiss on the basis of attorney immunity. The court of appeals affirmed. Counsel’s actions were “possibly wrongful,” the court explained, but “were the ‘kinds of actions’ that are part of an attorney’s duties in representing a client in litigation,” such that attorney immunity barred all of the plaintiff’s claims. FULL STORY Read More

QUICK EASY SHARE OPTIONS PRESS + FOR MORE