Category: NEWS

Cook County Chicago Illinois County Judge Shauna L Boliker exposed for possible bribery

  By , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Cook County Chicago Illinois County Judge shauna louise boliker and Lisa Casanova Public Guardian exposed for possible bribery

COOK COUNTY RECORDER HIDES JUDGE SHAUNA L. BOLIKER’S LOANS Following the disclosure of Judge Shauna L. Boliker’s considerable loan history, with concerns voiced that these loans are in fact a vehicle for bribery, the Cook County Recorder has now made this information unavailable. You can read the initial article containing the data on these loans here Today’s search, again using her husband’s name, came up with NOTHING! NONE of the hits relate to the appropriate party! Back Search : Name: Andrews David M Total Documents : 6 Click the boxes to select your documents before adding to the cart. You may remove documents from your cart by clicking the “Shopping Cart”, which is located in the upper right corner of the page. Buy Documents Buy Search Result (No Images) View DocDoc Number Doc RecordedDoc ExecutedDoc TypeConsi. Amt.1st Grantor1st GranteeAssoc. Doc#1st PIN View22213213518/1/20227/28/2022RELEASEMORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEMS INCANDREWS MARK DAVID200155710317-17-235-019-1138 933 W VAN BUREN ST, CHICAGO View 22209420227/28/20227/11/2022WARRANTY DEED$375,000.00ANDREWS MARK DAVIDTRUONG NORMA E17-17-235-019-1138 933 W VAN BUREN ST, CHICAGOView20036060302/5/20201/31/2020RELEASEMORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEMS INCANDREWS MARK DAVID190744902617-17-235-019-1138 933 W VAN BUREN ST, CHICAGO View 20015571031/15/20201/7/2020MORTGAGE$306,000.00ANDREWS MARK DAVIDMORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEMS INC222132135117-17-235-019-1138 933 W VAN BUREN ST, CHICAGO View 19074490263/15/20192/22/2019MORTGAGE$303,600.00ANDREWS MARK DAVIDMORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEMS INC200360603017-17-235-019-1138 933 W VAN BUREN ST, CHICAGO View 19074490253/15/20192/13/2019WARRANTY DEED$330,000.00DELM ALISENANDREWS MARK DAVID17-17-235-019-1138 933 W VAN BUREN ST, CHICAGO Page 1 of 1 Page Size: 100 We have an epidemic of crime in America being committed by the ABA (a gang) with members who swear an oath to their own not justice or the people they serve. Read More

QUICK EASY SHARE OPTIONS PRESS + FOR MORE

End California’s Judicial Corruption before the November 8, 2022 General Election. Here’s How!

  By , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Help pass Los Angeles California Dr Richard I Fine bill amend SBX 2 11 Help stop the corruption

The History and Effect of California’s Judicial Corruption In 1985, Los Angeles County started paying California Superior Court Judges sitting on the State of California Superior Court for the County of Los Angeles “supplemental judicial benefits” in addition to the judges’ State of California Compensation. In 1988, Los Angeles County Supervisors justified the payments stating they were necessary to “attract and retain qualified people to serve as judges on the LA Superior Court.” On its face, such explanation doesn’t make sense. Paying a sitting judge, a “supplemental judicial benefit” will not retain him/her in office as he/she must face an election to retain his/her judicial office. It will not recruit a judge as the judge is already in office. Nor does it appear that over time the Los Angeles County “Supplemental Judicial Benefits” attracted more successful, experienced private lawyers to apply to be politically appointed for judgeships or to run for judgeships more than the usual government lawyers such as deputy district attorneys, deputy public defenders, county counsels and state employees. The real reason for the Los Angeles County “Supplemental Judicial Benefits” payments was to increase the compensation of the individual members of the Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors. Article II, Section 4 of the Los Angeles County Charter states in relevant part: “They [Board of Supervisors] shall each receive as compensation for their services a salary, payable monthly from the County Treasury, which shall be the same as that now or hereafter prescribed by law for a judge of the Superior Court in and for the County of Los Angeles,”. Other counties and Superior Courts followed Los Angeles County In 2008, such payments were held to be unconstitutional under Article VI, Section 19 of the California Constitution, in… Read More

QUICK EASY SHARE OPTIONS PRESS + FOR MORE