THE TWELVE PRESUMPTIONS OF COURT

Exhibit # 001-1 THE TWELVE PRESUMPTIONS OF COURT All shall be considered rebutted Canon 3228 A Roman Court does not operate according to any true rule of law, but by presumptions of the law. Therefore, if presumptions presented by the private Bar Guild are not rebutted they become fact and are therefore said to stand true [Or as “truth in commerce”]. There are twelve (12) key presumptions asserted by the private Bar Guilds which if unchallenged stand true being Public Record, Public Service, Public Oath, Immunity, Summons, Custody, Court of Guardians, Court of Trustees, Government as Executor/Beneficiary, Executor De Son Tort, Incompetence, and Guilt: 1. The Presumption of Public Record is that any matter brought before a lower Roman Courts is a matter for the public record when in fact it is presumed by the members of the private Bar Guild that the matter is a private Bar Guild business matter. Unless openly rebuked and rejected by stating clearly the matter is to be on the Public Record, the matter remains a private Bar Guild matter completely under private Bar Guild rules; and 2. The Presumption of Public Service is that all the members of the Private Bar Guild who have all sworn a solemn secret absolute oath to their Guild then act as public agents of the Government, or “public officials” by making additional oaths of public office that openly and deliberately contradict their private “superior” oaths to their own Guild. Unless openly rebuked and rejected, the claim stands that these private Bar Guild members are legitimate public servants and therefore trustees under public oath; and 3. The Presumption of Public Oath is that all members of the Private Bar Guild acting in the capacity of “public officials” who… Read More

QUICK EASY SHARE OPTIONS PRESS + FOR MORE

Disney Grandson Files Request for Temporary Restraining Order to Stop His “Hostile” Trustees From Selling His Wyoming Family Ranch

Bradford and Sherry Disney Lund Walt Disney's grandson negotiate sale of ranch

The Trustees will receive hundreds of thousands in self-enrichment from the sale, according to Lanny J. Davis, attorney for Lund
“One has to ask why the Trustees are so intent on ignoring the wishes of their own beneficiary, to whom they owe a fiduciary duty,” said Lanny J. Davis

NEWS PROVIDED BY
Lanny Davis
Jan 11, 2022, 11:12 ET

LOS ANGELES, Jan. 11, 2022 /PRNewswire/ — Walt Disney’s grandson, Bradford D. Lund, has filed a request for a temporary restraining order in the Los Angeles County Superior Court in an attempt to block his four trustees – L. Andrew Gifford, Robert L. Wilson, Douglas M. Strode, and the First Republic Trust Company (“FRTC”) (collectively, “the Trustees”) – from selling a pristine and sentimental 110-acre Wyoming family ranch, set on the outskirts of Teton National Park (owned by his trust, together with his sister’s trust) to an undisclosed third party. The Trustees even refused to tell Mr. Lund who the buyers are. He alleges that he has filed this emergency request in order to prevent this family treasure from being lost forever, most probably to commercial development.

According to the filing, Mr. Lund has been attempting to stop the sale since September 2020 when the Trustees for the first time indicated that they entered into a sales contract with an unidentified third-party. Mr. Lund’s attempt to stop the sale in the Wyoming state court system was unsuccessful based upon a legal doctrine, forum non conveniens, where the Wyoming court determined that the issue should be decided in the Los Angeles courts with the rest of Mr. Lund’s probate case. The Wyoming decision was not based on the merits of Mr. Lund’s complaint.

According to Mr. Lund, the Trustees had originally agreed in April of 2019 to allow him to purchase his sister Michelle’s ownership in the ranch for an agreed amount. The purchase was to be made with Mr. Lund’s trust assets. The Trustees allegedly violated their agreement with Mr. Lund and went forward to sell the ranch to a third party. Mr. Lund believes that the Trustees are only concerned about personally benefiting financially and not concerned about the wishes of Mr. Lund or their agreement with him.

Mr. Lund’s filing alleges “the only benefit from the sale of [the ranch] is to the Trustees:

“The only benefit from the sale of [the ranch] is to the Trustees. The Trustees, as custom and practice has dictated in [Brad and Michelle’s trusts], are entitled to receive a 2% Real Estate fee regarding the sale of any real estate owned by the trusts. Therefore, a sale of [the ranch] for $35 million will allow the Trustees to receive $700,000 (or approximately $175,000 each) from this sale.”

The Ranch has been in Mr. Lund’s family for forty years, and his filing asserts that it was always meant to be kept in the family for their use and enjoyment. Mr. Lund believes that the law supports his claims that the Trustees should not be taking any Real Estate Fee for the sale of the ranch and that by doing this they have created a conflict of interest and they are violating their fiduciary duty to him.

“One has to ask why the Trustees are so intent on ignoring the wishes of their own beneficiary, to whom they owe a fiduciary duty,” said Lanny J. Davis, an attorney advisor for Mr. Lund. “My client has established that he and his sister’s trusts are funded more than enough to last their lifetimes, and the loss of this precious childhood property would be incalculable.”

Contact: Alex Lange
alange@tridentdmg.com
(202) 480-4309

SOURCE Lanny Davis

NEWS STORIES
Walt Disney’s Grandson Fights To Save Family Wyoming Ranch
Walt Disney’s Grandson, Bradford Lund, fights to keep the family Wyoming ranch
Disney ranch dispute to stay in California, Wyoming Supreme Court rules
Grandson files appeal to return Disney ranch dispute in Wyoming
Trustees of Walt Disney’s grandson negotiate sale of ranch
Trustees of Walt Disney’s Grandson Negotiate Sale of Ranch
Wyoming Supreme Court To Hear Arguments In Disney Ranch Sale


QUICK EASY SHARE OPTIONS PRESS + FOR MORE