• Help Document the Epidemic of Judicial Abuse Victims

THE TWELVE PRESUMPTIONS OF COURT

Exhibit # 001-1
THE TWELVE PRESUMPTIONS OF COURT
All shall be considered rebutted
Canon 3228

A Roman Court does not operate according to any true rule of law, but by presumptions
of the law. Therefore, if presumptions presented by the private Bar Guild are not
rebutted they become fact and are therefore said to stand true [Or as “truth in
commerce”]. There are twelve (12) key presumptions asserted by the private Bar Guilds
which if unchallenged stand true being Public Record, Public Service, Public Oath,
Immunity, Summons, Custody, Court of Guardians, Court of Trustees, Government as
Executor/Beneficiary, Executor De Son Tort, Incompetence, and Guilt:

1. The Presumption of Public Record is that any matter brought before a lower
Roman Courts is a matter for the public record when in fact it is presumed by the
members of the private Bar Guild that the matter is a private Bar Guild business
matter. Unless openly rebuked and rejected by stating clearly the matter is to be
on the Public Record, the matter remains a private Bar Guild matter completely
under private Bar Guild rules; and

2. The Presumption of Public Service is that all the members of the Private Bar
Guild who have all sworn a solemn secret absolute oath to their Guild then act as
public agents of the Government, or “public officials” by making additional oaths
of public office that openly and deliberately contradict their private “superior”
oaths to their own Guild. Unless openly rebuked and rejected, the claim stands
that these private Bar Guild members are legitimate public servants and
therefore trustees under public oath; and

3. The Presumption of Public Oath is that all members of the Private Bar Guild
acting in the capacity of “public officials” who have sworn a solemn public oath
remain bound by that oath and therefore bound to serve honestly, impartiality and
fairly as dictated by their oath. Unless openly challenged and demanded, the
presumption stands that the Private Bar Guild members have functioned under
their public oath in contradiction to their Guild oath. If challenged, such
individuals must recuse themselves as having a conflict of interest and cannot
possibly stand under a public oath; and

4. The Presumption of Immunity is that key members of the Private Bar Guild in the
capacity of “public officials” acting as judges, prosecutors and magistrates who
have sworn a solemn public oath in good faith are immune from personal claims
of injury and liability. Unless openly challenged and their oath demanded, the
presumption stands that the members of the Private Bar Guild as public trustees
acting as judges, prosecutors and magistrates are immune from any personal
accountability for their actions; and

5. The Presumption of Summons is that by custom a summons un-rebutted stands
and therefore one who attends Court is presumed to accept a position
(defendant, juror, witness) and jurisdiction of the court. Attendance to court is
usually invitation by summons. Unless the summons is rejected and returned,
with a copy of the rejection filed prior to choosing to visit or attend, jurisdiction
and position as the accused and the existence of “guilt” stands; and

6. The Presumption of Custody is that by custom a summons or warrant for arrest
un-rebutted stands and therefore one who attends Court is presumed to be a
thing and therefore liable to be detained in custody by “Custodians”. [This
includes the dead legal fiction non-human “PERSON” that corporate-
governments rules and regulations are written for.*] Custodians may only lawfully
hold custody of property and “things” not flesh and blood soul possessing beings.
Unless this presumption is openly challenged by rejection of summons and/or at
court, the presumption stands you are a thing and property and therefore lawfully
able to be kept in custody by custodians; and

7. The Presumption of Court of Guardians is the presumption that as you may be
listed as a “resident” of a ward of a local government area and have listed on
your “passport” the letter P, you are a pauper and therefore under the “Guardian”
powers of the government and its agents as a “Court of Guardians”. Unless this
presumption is openly challenged to demonstrate you are both a general
guardian and general executor of the matter (trust) before the court, the
presumption stands and you are by default a pauper, and lunatic and therefore
must obey the rules of the clerk of guardians (clerk of magistrates court);

8. The Presumption of Court of Trustees is that members of the Private Bar Guild
presume you accept the office of trustee as a “public servant” and “government
employee” just by attending a Roman Court, as such Courts are always for public
trustees by the rules of the Guild and the Roman System. Unless this
presumption is openly challenged to state you are merely visiting by “invitation” to
clear up the matter and you are not a government employee or public trustee in
this instance, the presumption stands and is assumed as one of the most
significant reasons to claim jurisdiction – simply because you “appeared”; and

9. The Presumption of Government acting in two roles as Executor and
Beneficiaryis that for the matter at hand, the Private Bar Guild appoint the judge/
magistrate in the capacity of Executor while the Prosecutor acts in the capacity of
Beneficiary of the trust for the current matter. Unless this presumption is openly
challenged to demonstrate you are both a general guardian and general executor
of the matter (trust) before the court, the presumption stands and you are by
default the trustee, therefore must obey the rules of the executor (judge/
magistrate); and

10. The Presumption of Executor De Son Tort is the presumption that if the accused
does seek to assert their right as Executor and Beneficiary over their body, mind
and soul they are acting as an Executor De Son Tort or a “false executor”
challenging the “rightful” judge as Executor. Therefore, the judge/magistrate
assumes the role of “true” executor and has the right to have you arrested,
detained, fined or forced into a psychiatric evaluation. Unless this presumption is
openly challenged by not only asserting one’s position as Executor as well as
questioning if the judge or magistrate is seeking to act as Executor De Son Tort,
the presumption stands and a judge or magistrate of the private Bar guild may
seek to assistance of bailiffs or sheriffs to assert their false claim; and

11. The Presumption of Incompetence is the presumption that you are at least
ignorant of the law, therefore incompetent to present yourself and argue properly.
Therefore, the judge/magistrate as executor has the right to have you arrested,
detained, fined or forced into a psychiatric evaluation. Unless this presumption is
openly challenged to the fact that you know your position as executor and
beneficiary and actively rebuke and object to any contrary presumptions, then it
stands by the time of pleading that you are incompetent then the judge or
magistrate can do what they need to keep you obedient; and

12. The Presumption of Guilt is the presumption that as it is presumed to be a private
business meeting of the Bar Guild, you are guilty whether you plead “guilty”, do
not plead or plead “not guilty”. Therefore unless you either have previously
prepared an affidavit of truth and motion to dismiss with extreme prejudice onto
the public record or call a demurrer, then the presumption is you are guilty and
the private Bar Guild can hold you until a bond is prepared to guarantee the
amount the guild wants to profit from you.

Syllogism
syl·lo·gism
/ˈsiləˌjizəm/
a noun

1. an instance of a form of reasoning in which a conclusion is drawn (whether validly
or not) from two given or assumed propositions (premises), each of which shares a
term with the conclusion, and shares a common or middle term not present in the
conclusion (e.g., all dogs are animals; all dogs have four legs; therefore all animals
have four legs). The problem here is not all animals have four legs!
• deductive reasoning as distinct from induction.”this school of epistemology is highly
advanced in syllogism and logical reasoning”

No fact or truth shall be tried in court! This is how they GET you!
The BAR tries to destroy us using Syllogism of the 12 Presumptions!
We will NOT accept any Presumption, Assumptions, or Hearsay!


Share with as many people as you can

Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.

  • MORE COURT VICTIM ONLINE SUPPORT, GET EXPOSURE

    Help Document the Epidemic of Judicial Abuse Victims List or find Ugly Judges, abusers and court victims Help Document the Epidemic of Judicial Abuse Victims Help Document the Epidemic of Judicial Abuse Victims