THE TWELVE PRESUMPTIONS OF COURT

Exhibit # 001-1 THE TWELVE PRESUMPTIONS OF COURT All shall be considered rebutted Canon 3228 A Roman Court does not operate according to any true rule of law, but by presumptions of the law. Therefore, if presumptions presented by the private Bar Guild are not rebutted they become fact and are therefore said to stand true [Or as “truth in commerce”]. There are twelve (12) key presumptions asserted by the private Bar Guilds which if unchallenged stand true being Public Record, Public Service, Public Oath, Immunity, Summons, Custody, Court of Guardians, Court of Trustees, Government as Executor/Beneficiary, Executor De Son Tort, Incompetence, and Guilt: 1. The Presumption of Public Record is that any matter brought before a lower Roman Courts is a matter for the public record when in fact it is presumed by the members of the private Bar Guild that the matter is a private Bar Guild business matter. Unless openly rebuked and rejected by stating clearly the matter is to be on the Public Record, the matter remains a private Bar Guild matter completely under private Bar Guild rules; and 2. The Presumption of Public Service is that all the members of the Private Bar Guild who have all sworn a solemn secret absolute oath to their Guild then act as public agents of the Government, or “public officials” by making additional oaths of public office that openly and deliberately contradict their private “superior” oaths to their own Guild. Unless openly rebuked and rejected, the claim stands that these private Bar Guild members are legitimate public servants and therefore trustees under public oath; and 3. The Presumption of Public Oath is that all members of the Private Bar Guild acting in the capacity of “public officials” who… Read More

QUICK EASY SHARE OPTIONS PRESS + FOR MORE

Dr. Richard I. Fine

Help pass Los Angeles California Dr Richard I Fine bill amend SBX 2 11 Help stop the corruption

Who is Dr. Richard I. Fine? Richard I. Fine, (Doctor of Law; Ph.D Law-International Law). He is a patriot and lawyer (presently qualified to practice before the United States Supreme Court). He was disbarred from California and “unlawfully incarcerated in solitary coercive confinement without charges being made” for 18 months in the Los Angeles County jail in retaliation for exposing (Dishonorable) Judge David Paul Yafee #29399 and all of the Los Angeles County Superior court judges for accepting unlawful payments/bribes from the county. These payments resulted in literally no one winning a case against the county when a judge made the decision. Dr. Richard I. Fine FULL BIO His Amend SBX 2 11 Legislation that can stop judges from getting away with legally accepting bribes (from tax payer’s funds) awarded by those in charge Dr. Richard I. Fine Videos Richard I. FINE – part 1 Richard Fine, a Champion for Justice, Part 1 Why Won’t the ACLU Help Jailed Attorney Richard Fine? #556 Trailer Interview: Richard Fine with Bill Windsor of Lawless America Family Law Report – Richard Fine Part 2: Miscarriage of Justice & Abuse of Power Richard Fine Knocks Off Another Judge #VB98 Richard Fine: His Darkest Moment in the LA County Jail #580-581 Trailer Richard FINE reveals HOW to fight Corrupt Judges The Imprisonment of Attorney Richard I. Fine Attorney Jailed Denied Rights for Exposing Judicial Corruption, Richard Fine California Richard Fine Teaches the Public How to Fight Corruption (5 of 5) National Safe Child Show-Richard Fine-Attorney Disbarred for Exposing Corruption in the Courts Richard Fine, an Anti-Corruption Champion, Part 1 of 2 Richard Fine, an Anti-Corruption Champion, Part 2 of 2 Free Richard I. Fine! Family Law Report – Richard Fine Part 1: Judicial Bribery &… Read More

QUICK EASY SHARE OPTIONS PRESS + FOR MORE