Disney Grandson Files Request for Temporary Restraining Order to Stop His “Hostile” Trustees From Selling His Wyoming Family Ranch

Bradford and Sherry Disney Lund Walt Disney's grandson negotiate sale of ranch

The Trustees will receive hundreds of thousands in self-enrichment from the sale, according to Lanny J. Davis, attorney for Lund
“One has to ask why the Trustees are so intent on ignoring the wishes of their own beneficiary, to whom they owe a fiduciary duty,” said Lanny J. Davis

NEWS PROVIDED BY
Lanny Davis
Jan 11, 2022, 11:12 ET

LOS ANGELES, Jan. 11, 2022 /PRNewswire/ — Walt Disney’s grandson, Bradford D. Lund, has filed a request for a temporary restraining order in the Los Angeles County Superior Court in an attempt to block his four trustees – L. Andrew Gifford, Robert L. Wilson, Douglas M. Strode, and the First Republic Trust Company (“FRTC”) (collectively, “the Trustees”) – from selling a pristine and sentimental 110-acre Wyoming family ranch, set on the outskirts of Teton National Park (owned by his trust, together with his sister’s trust) to an undisclosed third party. The Trustees even refused to tell Mr. Lund who the buyers are. He alleges that he has filed this emergency request in order to prevent this family treasure from being lost forever, most probably to commercial development.

According to the filing, Mr. Lund has been attempting to stop the sale since September 2020 when the Trustees for the first time indicated that they entered into a sales contract with an unidentified third-party. Mr. Lund’s attempt to stop the sale in the Wyoming state court system was unsuccessful based upon a legal doctrine, forum non conveniens, where the Wyoming court determined that the issue should be decided in the Los Angeles courts with the rest of Mr. Lund’s probate case. The Wyoming decision was not based on the merits of Mr. Lund’s complaint.

According to Mr. Lund, the Trustees had originally agreed in April of 2019 to allow him to purchase his sister Michelle’s ownership in the ranch for an agreed amount. The purchase was to be made with Mr. Lund’s trust assets. The Trustees allegedly violated their agreement with Mr. Lund and went forward to sell the ranch to a third party. Mr. Lund believes that the Trustees are only concerned about personally benefiting financially and not concerned about the wishes of Mr. Lund or their agreement with him.

Mr. Lund’s filing alleges “the only benefit from the sale of [the ranch] is to the Trustees:

“The only benefit from the sale of [the ranch] is to the Trustees. The Trustees, as custom and practice has dictated in [Brad and Michelle’s trusts], are entitled to receive a 2% Real Estate fee regarding the sale of any real estate owned by the trusts. Therefore, a sale of [the ranch] for $35 million will allow the Trustees to receive $700,000 (or approximately $175,000 each) from this sale.”

The Ranch has been in Mr. Lund’s family for forty years, and his filing asserts that it was always meant to be kept in the family for their use and enjoyment. Mr. Lund believes that the law supports his claims that the Trustees should not be taking any Real Estate Fee for the sale of the ranch and that by doing this they have created a conflict of interest and they are violating their fiduciary duty to him.

“One has to ask why the Trustees are so intent on ignoring the wishes of their own beneficiary, to whom they owe a fiduciary duty,” said Lanny J. Davis, an attorney advisor for Mr. Lund. “My client has established that he and his sister’s trusts are funded more than enough to last their lifetimes, and the loss of this precious childhood property would be incalculable.”

Contact: Alex Lange
alange@tridentdmg.com
(202) 480-4309

SOURCE Lanny Davis

NEWS STORIES
Walt Disney’s Grandson Fights To Save Family Wyoming Ranch
Walt Disney’s Grandson, Bradford Lund, fights to keep the family Wyoming ranch
Disney ranch dispute to stay in California, Wyoming Supreme Court rules
Grandson files appeal to return Disney ranch dispute in Wyoming
Trustees of Walt Disney’s grandson negotiate sale of ranch
Trustees of Walt Disney’s Grandson Negotiate Sale of Ranch
Wyoming Supreme Court To Hear Arguments In Disney Ranch Sale


QUICK EASY SHARE OPTIONS PRESS + FOR MORE

The Lawyer ‘s Duty of Loyalty: To the Client or to the Institution?

THE LAWYER’S DUTY OF LOYALTY by Ramsey Clark I. My subject has within its range a major ethical problem of our society and of our profession. Law can be very important to life. It is essential, finally, to survival. I would like to think of it, for purposes of this conversation, as Hegel did in his work on the philosophy of right where he saw in the development of civilization an expansion of the consciousness of freedom, with the securing of rights under law as the actualization of freedom. Lawyers are involved in that process. All too often we think that law and legal justice can be something apart from life and social justice, that we can have one set of values and aspirations and attainments in one and something different in the other. But so profound an analyst and philosopher of our law and times as David Bazelon has wondered whether legal justice is possible without social justice. II. It is almost absurd to believe that humanity has a capacity to set aside its prejudices and other predilections in a courtroom. Culture is lord of everything, of mortals and immortals king, Pindar said. Law is caught up within the confines of that culture. It’s a slower part, but it is a part. Felix Cohen has said that most judges and lawyers, indeed most people, are as unaware of their culture patterns as they are of the* The talks collected here are adapted from the Baker and McKenzie Foundation Inaugural Lecture Series: Inquiry into Contemporary Problems of Legal Ethics, at Loyola University of Chicago School of Law, Spring 1984. ** Mr. Clark’s talk, which is presented here in a version edited with his permission by the Editors, was given March… Read More

QUICK EASY SHARE OPTIONS PRESS + FOR MORE