Corrupt Multnomah County District Attorney‘s Office

Work in Progress Claims of gender bias at Multnomah District Attorney‘s Office Last week, an attorney at the Multnomah District Attorney’s Office, Amber Kinney, submitted her letter of resignation to her boss, Mike Schmidt, who was elected in 2020 on his platform of criminal justice system reform and police accountability. Kinney explained that she was not quitting because of any “philosophical differences” with Schmidt’s policies — for which he was elected in a landslide — but rather due to her workload and his gender discrimination, which she stated had impacted the promotion and retention of women prosecutors. Kinney noted that the problem of gender discrimination predated Schmidt’s arrival at the office, but asserted that it had worsened under him — even going so far as to claim that “women’s forward progress” had been “set back decades” under his leadership. She included statistics in her letter to support her allegations: Women mostly have not been hired or promoted into leadership roles under Schmidt; and of the people who have resigned since Schmidt’s election, the majority were women. Those stats appear compelling at a glance, but Kinney’s data was produced in a relatively small office (77 attorneys) during an atypical period of time (Covid, Portland protests, absolute mess left after the dramatic resignation of Schmidt’s predecessor, etc.).¹ Under those conditions, it wouldn’t take much to skew the numbers dramatically and lead to a faulty hypothesis. More significantly, Kinney cannot speak for the other women who resigned. Regardless, the interesting part of Kinney’s letter — which the Oregonian wisely chose to exclude from its article about her departure — was her suggestion of work accommodations for women: “Increased workloads disproportionately impact women. Women, especially those of us who are also mothers, are often tasked with much of the domestic responsibilities in addition to… Read More

QUICK EASY SHARE OPTIONS PRESS + FOR MORE

Department of Justice rejected the complaint to investigate the obviously abusive Britney Spears Conservatorship

August 18, 2021 US Department of Justice 950 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW Civil Rights Division Disability Rights Section – 1425 NYA Washington, D.C. 20530 Re: Case number: 94490-HGN Violation of due process in Conservatorship of Britney Spears Violation of civil rights in Conservatorship of Britney Spears Individuals under conservatorship are adjudicated to lack capacity. Therefore, all conservatees are guaranteed protections under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). In 2008, a California court placed Britney Spears under conservatorship, granting her father James Spears nearly absolute control over Ms. Spears’ person and estate. The initial conservatorship proceedings were characterized by denial of due process. The ensuing thirteen years of conservatorship have been and continue to be plagued by civil rights violations. These matters fall under the jurisdiction of the Department of Justice in their role of investigating and prosecuting civil rights violations. THE COURT DENIED DUE PROCESS OF LAW The 14th Amendment states the following: No state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law… DENIED NOTICE OF CONSERVATORSHIP HEARING Probate Code 2250(e)(2) states, (2) Notice of the hearing shall be personally delivered to the proposed conservatee… Media reported that Ms. Spears was not served notice of her initial conservatorship hearing. DENIED RIGHT TO ATTEND CONSERVATORSHIP HEARINGS Probate Code 2250.4 states: The proposed temporary conservatee shall attend the hearing… Media reported that Ms. Spears was not allowed to attend her initial conservatorship hearings. DENIED RIGHT TO COUNSEL OF CHOICE American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) in their 2021 Amici curiae provided extensive legal argument supporting Ms. Spears’ right to counsel of choice. The 2021 court agreed… Read More

QUICK EASY SHARE OPTIONS PRESS + FOR MORE