Supreme Court of the United States CAROL PULLIAM, Petitioner vs. USC On Petition For A Writ Of Certiorari RICHARD ISAAC FINE

Richard I Fine Petition to the Supreme Court of California For A Writ Of Certiorari

“Richard I. Fine Presents the argument against paying County or Court Supplemental or Local Judicial Benefit Payments to Judges, to the US Supreme Court.”   ========================================================================================= In The Supreme Court of the United States ——————————— ♦ ——————————— CAROL PULLIAM, Petitioner, vs. UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA, Respondent. ——————————— ♦ ——————————— On Petition For A Writ Of Certiorari To The Supreme Court Of The State Of California ——————————— ♦ ——————————— PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI ——————————— ♦ ——————————— RICHARD ISAAC FINE, ESQ. P.O. Box 789, 1187 Coast Village Rd., Ste. 1 Santa Barbara, CA 93102-0789 Telephone: (310) 622-6900 Email: Counsel for Petitioner Carol Pulliam ================================================================================================== COCKLE LEGAL BRIEFS (800) 225-6964 WWW.COCKLELEGALBRIEFS.COM i QUESTION PRESENTED Do state court trial judges, court of appeal justices and supreme court justices “war against the (United States) Constitution” by denying state litigants Fourteenth Amendment Constitutional due process when each and/or all these judicial officers did not disclose and recuse themselves as required by state law, state Code of Judicial Ethics and/or other state or federal requirements when he/she: (1) currently receives or in the past received payments from: (a) the county currently paying or paid the Respondent for Respondent’s services; and/or (b) an entity jointly offering services with Respondent; (c) a partner, representative and/or affiliate of the Respondent; and/or (d) another county; and/or (2) as a lawyer who personally represented and/or his/her firm represented the county making the payments to the judges in cases involving: (a) the legality and/or the constitutionality of the payments; and (b) subsequent statutes relating to the payments. ii LIST OF PARTIES All parties appear in the caption of the case on the cover page: (1) Carol Pulliam; and (2) University of Southern California. MSS Nurses Registry was a defendant in the trial court.   CORPORATE… Read More



Help Prove the Pattern of Judicial Abuse by adding your abuse case to the National Court Victim Database

GET YOUR ABUSE LISTED NOW, DON’T LET THE JUDGES HIDE THEIR CRIMES You can make a difference, share this post by using the share options. Make sure your Judicial Abuse case gets listed by County and State. List your info anonymously or in detail so fellow victims and activists and help network you with the other nationwide court victims. CLICK HERE TO ADD YOUR CASE NOW Join the Community of COURT VICTIMS HERE NOW It’s a fact that judges hide bribery, fraud, denial of due process and fraud upon the court in every city and state in America. Los Angeles Dr. Richard I. Fine proved that over 90% of California judges are accepting bribes to not rule in favor. The government and law enforcement do nothing to protect the public. The FBI and DOJ ignore millions of victims every year to allow the judges and lawyers to profit from the lack of accountability and prosecution. Check out Reuters Investigative story on how judges are never prosecuted “Absolute Power Corrupts absolutely” SEE THE TEFLON ROBE by Reuters Check out HOW EASY IT IS TO BRIBE A JUDGE & HOW TO RESEARCH A JUDGES FINANCES   Read More