Christopher Jordan Dorner

HOW A PROVEN CORRUPT POLICE DEPARTMENT PROMOTES ABUSERS AND CRIMINALS, PUNISHES ANYONE WHO SPEAKS OUT. ASSANGE, SNODEN AND DORNER ARE EXAMPLES Los Angeles Police Department has been exposed many times for Corruption, cover up, abuse and racism. FACTUAL LONG HISTORY OF CORRUPTION WITHIN THE DEPARTMENT Hundreds of cases involving LAPD officers accused of corruption now under review 3 LAPD officers charged with falsifying records to claim people were gang members, associates Rampart scandal Rampart scandal Timeline WHAT WOULD A CORRUPT POLICE DEPARTMENT DO TO COVER UP IT’S CRIMES AND ABUSE? While some who follow a corrupt agenda may not think Christopher Dorner is a court victim, if you check your facts, he was victimized by a proven corrupt and unethical Judge David P. Yaffe who is a known and proven judge who accepts bribes from Los Angeles County which are paid via taxpayer funds. See SBX211 Going to court seeking justice, Dorner had no idea that all his efforts, money, evidence, facts and documentation would be totally ignored by Judge Yaffe having been bribed. The public needs to be aware of the facts and cover up by a very corrupt Los Angeles County Superior court and Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Department (corrupt in prison Sheriff Lee Baca) and Corrupt Los Angeles City Police Department (Charles Beck) who do not want a federal investigation or outside eyes finding out how corrupt Los Angeles County is. Christopher Dorner: Uncensored Manifesto of a former LAPD officer As police in southern California continue their manhunt Friday for alleged murderer and former LAPD officer Christopher Jordan Dorner, new details are emerging about his 11,000-word manifesto. Largely ignored as the ramblings of an individual who was extremely unhappy with his lot in life, Dorner has now… Read More

QUICK EASY SHARE OPTIONS PRESS + FOR MORE

Support this Bill to GET JUSTICE for ALL COURT VICTIMS Nationwide

Support this Dr Richard I Fine Los Angeles County California Corrupt Members ignores judicial corruption victims

History of SBX 211 and AB 2960 SBX 2 11 Commencing in the mid to late 1980s California Counties and State Superior Courts began paying State Superior Court judges (Trial Court judges) payments in addition to their State Compensation. These payments were called “Supplemental or Local Judicial Benefit Payments” (payments). California Constitution, Article VI, Section 19, required Judicial State Compensation could only be set by the California Legislature. The payments were held to violate the California Constitution in Sturgeon v. County of Los Angeles, 167 Cal.App.4th 630 (2008), Review Denied, 2009). In response, the California Legislature approved and Governor Schwarzenegger signed SBX 2 11 on February 20, 2009, Effective May 20, 2009: (1) allowing the payments to continue in Section 2 and adding such as Section 68220 to the California Government Code; (2) defining the payments to include salary, compensation, benefits 401K and 457K plans in Section 3 and adding such as Section 68221 to the California Government Code; (3) stating nothing in SBX 2 11 requires the Judicial Council to pay for judicial benefits or previous benefits in Section 4 and adding such as Section 68222 to the California Government Code. At all times, the payments violated both California and federal Criminal laws as “bribes” under California Criminal law and 18 U.S.C. Section 1346- “the intangible right to honest services” under Federal law. SBX 2 11 addressed the California violations in Section 5 with retroactive immunity as follows: “Notwithstanding any other law, no governmental entity, or officer or employee of a governmental entity, shall incur any liability or be subject to prosecution or disciplinary action because of benefits provided to a judge under the official action of a governmental entity prior to the effective date of this act on… Read More

QUICK EASY SHARE OPTIONS PRESS + FOR MORE