Corrupt Jack Kenneth Conway

Corrupt dishonest Jack Kenneth Conway 45063 2460 Huntington Dr, San Marino CA 91108 Disbarred

Jack Kenneth Conway #45063 This licensee is prohibited from practicing law in California by order of the California Supreme Court. License Status: Disbarred Address: 2460 Huntington Dr, San Marino, CA 91108 County: Los Angeles County Phone Number: (626) 285-4333 Law School: Southwestern Univ SOL; Los Angeles CA License Status, Disciplinary and Administrative History Below you will find all changes of license status due to both non-disciplinary administrative matters and disciplinary actions. Date License Status Discipline Administrative Action Present Disbarred 12/20/2014 Disbarred Disbarment 13-O-15643 7/20/2014 Not Eligible To Practice Law in California Ordered inactive 13-O-15643 8/30/2013 Not Eligible To Practice Law in California Discipline w/actual suspension 12-O-13006 12/30/2012 Disciplinary charges filed in State Bar Court 12-O-13006 1/15/1970 Admitted to The State Bar of California BACKGROUND Jack K. Conway American lawyer, specializing in the field of Insurance Law, Products Liability Law, Professional Liability Law, Litigation, Family Law, Personal Injury Litigation. Jack K. Conway, Jack K. was born on July 10, 1930 in Los Angeles, California, United States. December 20, 2014 JACK KENNETH CONWAY [#45063], 84, of San Marino, was disbarred Dec. 20, 2014 and ordered to comply with rule 9.20 of the California Rules of Court. Jack K. Conway stipulated that he held himself out as entitled to practice law when he was suspended, failed to inform one judge of his status and submitted a forged document to another judge. In January 2013, Jack K. Conway was suspended for two years as a result of earlier misconduct. The order became effective on Aug. 30, 2013. Despite that fact, on Sept. 8, 2013, Jack K. Conway sent a letter to another attorney on behalf of a client asking to terminate his client’s spousal support and enclosed the necessary court document. A couple days… Read More

QUICK EASY SHARE OPTIONS PRESS + FOR MORE

Corrupt Kamala D. Harris

Corrupt Kamala Devi Harris Irony Alert: Kamala Harris Profited from an Affair with Willie Brown, Yet She Wages War on Sex Work Deputy Atty. Gen. Kevin R. Vienna was there to urge three judges on the U.S. 9th Circuit Court of Appeals to uphold murder convictions against Johnny Baca for two 1995 killings in Riverside County. Other courts had already determined that prosecutors had presented false evidence in Baca’s trial but upheld the verdicts anyway. Vienna had barely started his argument when the pummeling began. Judge Alex Kozinski asked Vienna if his boss, Atty. Gen. Kamala D. Harris, wanted to defend a conviction “obtained by lying prosecutors.” If Harris did not back off the case, Kozinski warned, the court would “name names” in a ruling that would not be “very pretty.” Judge Kim Wardlaw wanted to know why Riverside County prosecutors presented a murder-for-hire case against the killer but did not charge the man they said had arranged the killings. “It looks terrible,” said Judge William Fletcher. The January hearing in Pasadena, posted online under new 9th Circuit policies, provided a rare and critical examination of a murder case in which prosecutors presented false evidence but were never investigated or disciplined. The low-profile case probably would have gone unnoticed if not for the video, which attorneys emailed to other attorneys and debated on blogs. In a series of searing questions, the three judges expressed frustration and anger that California state judges were not cracking down on prosecutorial misconduct. By law, federal judges are supposed to defer to the decisions of state court judges. Prosecutors “got caught this time but they are going to keep doing it because they have state judges who are willing to look the other way,” Kozinski… Read More

QUICK EASY SHARE OPTIONS PRESS + FOR MORE