Judicial Corruption SBX-211 Cover-up by California Government update
Judicial Corruption – SBX-211 Cover-up by California Government update A brief overview of the Richard I. Fine Judicial Abuse Crime Follow-up comments to an LA Times Article posted below: Note Judge Yaffe’s Order, where he states in pertinent part: “… He refuses to even discuss his obligations to the judgment creditor, but portrays himself as a lone hero who is being incarcerated because he has exposed a vast conspiracy of over 400 judges of this court who are dishonestly collecting money to which they are not entitled. This contention has now been rejected at all levels of the Federal and California Judiciary.” Clearly part of that passage is misleading and arguably could be called false, as the case of Sturgeon v. LA County, et. al. (2008) 167 Cal.App. 4th 670, rev. denied, in fact found and held that the double benefit payments that the LA County Superior Court judges had been receiving since 1988 were – UNCONSTITUTIONAL – or illegal. Wouldn’t this fact give a reader of the article a totally different perspective on what Mr Fine was doing? On what Judge Yaffe was doing? On what the other courts – at all levels of the Federal and California Judiciary – were doing? Wouldn’t basic journalistic standards require this fact be reported in the article?Of course, as most of you are aware, the LA County judges, led by Chief Justice Ronald George, promptly ran up to Sacramento and submitted a a bill – SBX-211 – to the legislature while they were in an emergency budget session (which forbids them from considering extraneous bills) attempting to deal with a state budget shortfall around $19BILLION. SBX-211 would circumvent Sturgeon , thereby allowing the double benefit payments to continue and also would give… Read More
