Category: NEWS

The Civil Grand Jury investigation into the Santa Clara Count public guardian

  By

The Civil Grand Jury investigation into the public guardian, like all civil grand jury investigations in California is coordinated between the Presiding Judge and the County Executive, and records, on county end are maintained by clerk of the board of supervisors. The final report to the Civil Grand Jury investigation is published here: https://www.scscourt.org/court_divisions/civil/cgj/2014/PublicGuardian.pdf The presiding judge in 2014, was the “Honorable” judge Brian Walsh. Captain Ricardo Urena, head of court security reported directly to the presiding judge, who also, pursuant to the California Rules of Court, oversees all the court cases for each department and assigns each of the judges. It was Sheriff Captain Riccardo Urena, who reviewed and authorized Detective David Carroll’s false police report which led to my false arrest on September 16th, 2014. One week before Donald Moody was escorted from premises for reasons tied to same Grand Jury investigation. In Detective David Carrolls false report, he deliberately evaded references to the Public Guardian and corresponding civil grand jury investigation & also, the whistleblower complaint that was filed with the County Executive Office. Records prove that the the public defenders office and Detective David Carroll knew of the details in the complaint , as did presiding judge Brian Walsh as they are cc’d to emails in the whistleblower complaint. Heidi’s attached Mc-410 form refers to policy that mandates that if County Council Attorney is subject of whistleblower complaint, then the investigation must be handled by County Executives office – Not the office of County Counsel.. This placed the County Executive in awkward corner, because if he received and processed the complaint, he would also be handling the corresponding civil grand jury investigation and would therefore, have to acknowledge within to the Grand Jury that the County… Read More

QUICK EASY SHARE OPTIONS PRESS + FOR MORE

Another Probate Murder?

  By

Another Probate Murder? More Questions Surface on Melodie Scott Cases By Janet C. Phelan Lawrence Yetzer was standing in his front yard, yelling. The fifty-two year old Rialto man, who was blind and suffered from cerebral palsy, had just discovered his father lying unmoving on the front room floor. “Help!” yelled Yetzer. “Something has happened to Dad!” Please help us!” Neighbor Yvonne Boone remembers that the paramedics came. Yetzer’s step-father, Max Vantilburg, had died of a heart attack. And Lawrence Yetzer, who had lived with his parents his entire life, was left alone in the world. He was also left a chunk of money, as the sole beneficiary of the Anne and Max Vantilburg estate. The court appointed Melodie Scott, of C.A.R.E., Inc, as the Successor Trustee of the Vantilburg estate. In a separate proceeding in San Bernardino Court, Melodie Scott moved to have herself appointed as Lawrence Yetzer’s conservator. In her application for the conservatorship, Scott declared to the court that Lawrence Yetzer had an IQ of only 59 and was unable to comprehend the conservatorship proceedings. Yvonne Boone, who knew the family for years, disputes this statement. “He wasn’t retarded like that,” said Boone, who had also served as a caregiver for Yetzer. “He was a real sociable, talkative guy. Sure, he was blind, but he understood what was going on around him.” The conservatorship lasted less than four months. On February 6, 2001, Lawrence Yetzer died. On January 14, Boone, who was caring for Yetzer on a full time basis at that point in time, noticed that he was sick. “He was coughing and his color was bad,” she recalls. He was taken to San Bernardino Community Hospital and admitted. The Sentinel has obtained these records, which… Read More

QUICK EASY SHARE OPTIONS PRESS + FOR MORE