Protectionism of Case Fixing is Alive and Well in U.S. Court of Appeals in Chicago

Protectionism of Case Fixing is Alive and Well in U.S. Court of Appeals in Chicago Brian Vukadinovich

As a country we are unfortunately at a point in time where the federal judiciary has in all reality turned itself into a criminal enterprise system with the chief judges of the circuits serving in the role of head of the syndicate of the circuit. The definition of organized crime is a national centralized enterprise run by criminals to engage in illegal activity. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit in Chicago fits this definition. In February 2018, retired Judge Richard A. Posner appointed me to serve as the executive director of the Posner Center of Justice for Pro Se’s and in March 2018, I traveled to Chicago to meet Judge Posner for lunch where Judge Posner disclosed to me that during the pendency of my appeal of a civil rights case against Valparaiso Indiana police years ago that Judge Michael S. Kanne had initiated an ex parte conversation with Judge Posner and called me a “troublemaker” and that Kanne “had it in for” me. Judge Posner then disclosed to me that Judge Kanne had asked Judge Posner in ex parte fashion — as a “favor” to Judge Kanne — to make sure that I did not prevail in my appeal against the Valparaiso police as Judge Posner was on the panel, to which Kanne was not. Judge Posner admitted that, regrettably, he (Judge Posner) had succumbed to Kanne’s “pressure” and therefore had accommodated Kanne’s “request” to have the district court’s decision in favor of the Valparaiso police affirmed even though Judge Posner knew that it “should have been reversed.” Judge Posner added that he knew what he did “was wrong,” but that this was “something that judges did for one another from time to time.” Judge Posner… Read More

QUICK EASY SHARE OPTIONS PRESS + FOR MORE

Chief Justice John Roberts: You Can Run, But You Can’t Hide!

The time has come for Chief Justice John Roberts to understand that, we, the people, are onto him, and that we demand an immediate attitude change from him, or he should resign. Roberts needs to understand that he has overplayed his hand, and the jig is up. It is no secret that Roberts steadfastly refuses to adopt a formal set of ethics rules for the United States Supreme Court —the only court in the United States without a formal set of ethics rules. Roberts says that “every justice seeks to follow high ethical standards” and therefore a code of ethics for the Supreme Court is unnecessary. Roberts’ stated position is that the Supreme Court has “no reason to adopt the Code of Conduct as its definitive source of ethical guidance.” Roberts says that “every justice seeks to follow high ethical standards” and that they may turn to “judicial opinions, treatises, scholarly articles and disciplinary decisions,” and also seek advice from one another. https://www.nbcnews.com/think/opinion/supreme-court-chief-justice-john-roberts-gives-incomplete-history-lesson-ncna1286943. That is laughable at best. We all know about the fiasco surrounding Justice Samuel Alito and the so called “leak” regarding the draft opinion that was written by Alito calling on the Court to overrule Roe v. Wade —the landmark 1973 opinion that legalized abortion which has been overturned by the current clown court headed by Roberts. https://www.npr.org/2022/06/24/1102305878/supreme-court-abortion-roe-v-wade-decision-overturn. And we all know about Clarence Thomas’ refusal to recuse himself from a case involving White House January 6 records which revealed texts Thomas’ wife, Ginni, had sent about the bid to overturn the 2020 election. So much for so called “ethics”. But what people don’t know is how Chief Justice John Roberts looks the other way in the face of evidence of case fixing and cover up by… Read More

QUICK EASY SHARE OPTIONS PRESS + FOR MORE