Duplicitous British judiciary, revengeful American bully and unbowed Assange

It was a marvel WikiLeaks founder, Julian Assange, was still standing this Monday, January 4, 2021 as British courts stopped his extradition to US, where he is guilty even before making a plea. WikiLeaks has been firing from all cylinders propelling a universal movement exposing secrets the powerful and the corrupt want concealed from humanity. In the last decade, Assange had holed up for seven years in the Ecuadorian Embassy in London where his view of the world was from the balcony. He has spent subsequent time in the Belmarsh Prison, London, where he is still being held because two days after his victory, the same court denied him bail pending the appeal of the Americans. All these have negatively rubbed off on his physical and perhaps mental health. In these ten years, his life was constantly endangered not only by the high possibility of some of the deadliest secret services in the world abducting, poisoning or liquidating him, but also rogue elements trying to make their nightmare, history. In a sane world, rather than being hunted and endangered, Assange would have been awarded the Nobel Peace Prize for significantly advancing Article 19 of the United Nations Human Rights Declaration. That Article states: “Everyone has the right to freedom of opinion and expression; this right includes freedom to hold opinions without interference and to seek, receive and impart information and ideas through any media and regardless of frontiers.” How many humans have sacrificed so much for the right to freedom of expression and information like Assange? How many have struck heavier blows against naked power, the powerful and the corrupt than Assange? He is more deserving of the Nobel Peace Prize than Barack Obama who got it one year into… Read More

QUICK EASY SHARE OPTIONS PRESS + FOR MORE

EPIDEMIC GUARDIANSHIP HORRORS

I’m sending a copy of this letter to the LA Times, NGA Executive Director, etc. You can forward it to the list of guardianship victims. 318 Philadelphia Avenue W. Pittston, PA 18643 December 10, 2005 Laury Gelardi, Executive Director National Guardianship Association 1604 North Country Clug Road Tucson, AZ 85716-3102Dear Ms. Gelardi: I am writing to your organization now due to the article in the LA Times and your organization’s response. I called about 2 yrs. ago but did not follow up with any written communication. The NGA has written ‘standards’ and ‘ethics’ which demonstrate the purpose and goals of guardianship. Most would then assume that the membership of Registered Guardians would follow those guidelines. When I called previously, I was told there was no mechanism to require accountability of the member Registered Guardians. Two years later, it is my hope and expectation that you have been able to structure a mechanism which insures accountability regarding those who are listed as Registered and/or Master Guardians. As you well know; guardianship is the only approved mechanism for denying all choice(s), rights, possessions, finances and contacts(including family) to the ‘ward’ other than the prison system which is supposed to deal with criminal activity. It is the single, most powerful force existing to deny/overcome all God-given, Constitutionally protected human rights of law abiding citizens. Your organization can require accountability of its members by examining complaints and requiring members to actually follow both your ‘standards of practice’ and ‘code of ethics’ or members should be removed from your membership listing. Since human beings are fallible and guardianship grants just about unlimited power over other human beings who become “wards”; accountability must be a priority. Abdicating responsibility soley to the discretion of the courts does… Read More

QUICK EASY SHARE OPTIONS PRESS + FOR MORE