Alleged Jurisdiction

The Scam of Alleged Jurisdiction Jurisdiction. A term of comprehensive import, embracing every kind of judicial action. It is the power of the court to decide a matter in controversy and presupposes the existence of a duly constituted court with control over the subject matter and the parties. Jurisdiction defines the powers of courts to inquire into facts, apply the law, make decisions, and declare judgment. The legal right by which judges exercise their authority. It exists when the court has cognizance of the class of cases involved, proper parties are present, and the point to be decided is within the powers of the court. Power and authority of a court to hear and determine a judicial proceeding; and power to render a particular judgment in question. The right and power of a court to adjudicate concerning the subject matter in a given case. The term may have different meanings in different contexts. Areas of authority; the geographic area in which a court has power or types of cases it has power to hear. Scope and extent of jurisdiction of federal courts is governed by 28 U.S.C.A. § 1251 et seq. (Black’s law Dictionary, 6th Ed, Abdg) Just what are ALL of the presuppositions that are being made about the defendant that might possibly be the basis for inferring that jurisdiction actually exists over him or her? If we do not know with 100% certainty what they are, then how can we possibly proceed onward from that point? How can we have any amount of certainty that we are not being treated unfairly in the legal system? Are we to just leave our concerns at the courthouse steps and trust in a crooked judiciary to treat us fairly and honestly?… Read More

QUICK EASY SHARE OPTIONS PRESS + FOR MORE

The Achilles’ Heel of EVERYTHING in the Universe

Yes, Dear Reader, there IS an Achilles’ Heel to everything in the universe, and it has been sitting right out in the open all of this time, just waiting for us to see it.    But few ever dared to even admit that it was there, let alone actually gaze upon it.    It is the commission of a crime, whether intentional or not.    Since no man or woman has any kind of a right to commit a crime of any amount, kind or nature against another, all that we need to do is expose the fact that such an action is being done, and it falls away from us.    This is because no man or woman has an actual obligation to suffer under the crimes of another.    If there is such an obligation, then it would be self negating, and not be a crime at all!    It would just be the natural order of things for us to commit what are heinous acts upon others, and everyone would have no choice but to endure and suffer under those acts.    But committing crimes upon others is NOT the natural order of life and the living of it, crimes are actions which harm others in some way, and some are far worse than others, but a crime of any magnitude is still a crime, and no matter how small some may think a certain crime is, no one has any duty to let it remain and hurt them to any degree.    Crime is universally thought of as a bad thing, not a virtue to aspire to.     This concept of exposing crimes in order to deflect them away from us is not really new. … Read More

QUICK EASY SHARE OPTIONS PRESS + FOR MORE