Corrupt Federal Judge George Caram Steeh

  By , , , , , , , ,

Federal Judge George Caram Steeh This Judge Enables Elder Abuse, ADA Violations Judge George Caram Steeh, III is an Article III federal judge for the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan 1998 nominated by President Bill Clinton and took on status January 2013. From Ann Arbor, Michigan, Judge George Steeh graduated from University of Michigan-Ann Arbor obtained both a bachelor’s and J.D. degrees in 1969 and 1973. Career After Law School, Judge George Steeh became part of the Genesee County Prosecutor’s Office from 1973 to 1980 as an Assistant prosecuting attorney 1973-1978, then promoted to First assistant prosecuting attorney 1978-1980. From 1980-1988, Judge George Steeh was a private practice attorney in Michigan before he was elected to the Macomb County Board of Commissioners 1986 until 1989, after which Judge George Steeh started his career as a Michigan District 41-B Court Judge 1989-1990 then elected judge for the 16th District Circuit Court from 1990-1998. Biographical Directory of Article III Federal Judges, 1789-present The directory includes the biographies of judges presidentially appointed to serve during good behavior since 1789 on the U.S. district courts, U.S. courts of appeals, Supreme Court of the United States, and U.S. Court of International Trade, as well as the former U.S. circuit courts, Court of Claims, U.S. Customs Court, and U.S. Court of Customs and Patent Appeals. Also included are judges who received presidential recess appointments to the above named courts but were not confirmed by the Senate to serve during good behavior. ICLE: Federal Judge George Caram Steeh, III United States District Court, Eastern District of Michigan Detroit, Michigan Judge George Caram Steeh III has been a U.S. District Court judge since 1998. Previously, he served as a Macomb County Circuit Court… Read More

QUICK EASY SHARE OPTIONS PRESS + FOR MORE
No comments

MICK WALLACE EXPOSES THE PROBLEM

  By ,

SUPPORT HERO MICK WALLACE Michael Wallace born 11/09/1955 an Irish politician and property developer who is a Member of the European Parliament MEP from Ireland since July 2019.5] Wallace gained his reputation for anti-establishment and left-wing populist views, becoming a frequent guest on political debate shows. He is a brave activist who speaks the truth, thus main stream media lies and spreads false propaganda to try and discredit the factual truth he shares. Read More

QUICK EASY SHARE OPTIONS PRESS + FOR MORE
No comments

Justice Media

  By , , , ,
Court Victim Justice Media Dr Robert Sarhan

WELCOME TO DR. ROBERT SARHAN COURT VICTIM JUSTICE MEDIA Find us at the following Media outlets by clicking on the logos below: Take a FACEBOOK Poll for judges Congressional Testimony: Dr. Robert Sarhan to Bill Windsor of Lawless America Dr. Robert Sarhan: Guardianships — Presented to Bill Windsor of Lawless America Robert Sarhan talks on the Public Interest Issues Show to Janet President Trump: Need Urgent Meeting to Stop Guardian Court Judges From Murdering our Parents PRESIDENT TRUMP STOP JUDGES ATTORNEYS AND GUARDIANS FROM STEALING OUR ESTATES/MURDERING OUR PARENTS A Breach of Trust by Susan Hodges Trailer Eyes on Predator Guardians “TV Series Episode ONE” [archiveorg scm-450075-eyesonpreditorguardianstvseri width=640 height=480 frameborder=0 webkitallowfullscreen=true mozallowfullscreen=true] Read More

QUICK EASY SHARE OPTIONS PRESS + FOR MORE

SBX 2 11 Public Outrage Proof

  By

PETITION “REPEAL SBX211 AND GIVE THE COURTS BACK TO THE PEOPLE” 3,373,772 Signatures and mailing to Congress SBX2 11 is a California Senate Bill passed in 2009. The bill was signed into law by Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger on February 20, 2009. The bill reinstated certain supplemental benefits for judges and gave them retroactive immunity for accepting compensation from the county of Los Angeles, which the Constitution clearly states shall be set by the legislature. A story about the bill, and a link to it, can be found at Full Disclosure Network. Ronald M. George is the chairman of the Judicial Council of California, which wrote SBX2 11. An organization known as Judicial Watch filed a lawsuit against the county. In October 2008, a California appellate court decision, Sturgeon v. County of Los Angeles declared the payments by the county to the judges were unconstitutional, thus reversing the decision made by a Superior Court of Los Angeles. In March 2009, attorney Dr. Richard I. Fine, was jailed in retaliation for exposing the corruption, now involving all branches of California government. More information can be found in the story by Full Disclosure Network. From his jail cell, Fine filed various motions and petitions, including a certiorari petition in the Supreme Court of the United States. The question before the court was whether or not Judge David P. Yaffe should have ruled in a case which Fine represented plaintiffs in, against the county of Los Angeles, which has been paying Judge David P. Yaffe and other judges the supplemental benefits for years. According to the U.S. Supreme Court docket information on Attorney Dr. Richard I. Fine’s petition, the justices were set to discuss the case on September 29, 2009 and denied the petition… Read More

QUICK EASY SHARE OPTIONS PRESS + FOR MORE

COURT VICTIM SOLUTION

  By

JUDICIAL CORRUPTION SOLUTION WHY IS THIS LEGISLATION NEEDED: This is a response to the systemic emergency judicial crisis in California existing since 1985 when individual counties and courts commenced paying State Superior Court judges sitting on State Superior Courts for their counties “supplemental or local judicial benefits” in addition to the State compensation (salary and benefits) paid to the judges by the State causing disparity in judges judicial salary and benefits, double taxation for citizens and residents in the “paying counties”, “unconstitutional (unlawful) ‘supplemental local judicial benefit payments’” to the judges resulting in 90% of California’s Superior Court judges receiving “bribes” under California and federal criminal laws; WHO CAN APPLY FOR THE COURT VICTIM ABUSE SUPPORT, OR WHOSE ELIGIBLE? Court Victims from cases since 1985 Civil, Criminal, Family, Juvenile, Probate, Appellate and Supreme Courts What states are eligible, this bill needs to be initially in one state after which it can be passed in all states WHAT DO COURT VICTIMS RECEIVE? Read the Legislation HERE victims get compensated starting at $1-10 million and cumulating, the judge who committed the misconduct is reported to the Commission on Judicial Performance who must complete its work within 6 months of the date of reporting and report monthly to the State Auditor who reports annually to the Legislature. The Judge who committed the misconduct is reported to the Commission on Judicial Performance who MUST complete its work within 6 months of the date of reporting and report monthly to the State Auditor who reports annually to the Legislature. The judges and justices are limited to a 24-year cumulative term for all offices held. Any WHAT DO COURT VICTIMS NEED TO DO TO HAVE THIS AMENDED BILL PASS? Write to your state senator, assembly person and… Read More

QUICK EASY SHARE OPTIONS PRESS + FOR MORE

SHOW PATTERN OF ABUSE ADD YOUR CASE TO THE NATIONAL COURT VICTIM DATABASE

  By , ,
Help document a pattern of abuse of judicial corruption

The public does not believe judicial corruption is at an epidemic level of MILLIONS of court victims every year. This is done via bribery (see research your judge for proof). Gag orders, sealing records, but all done illegally in violation of law. The problem is judges ignore all law, rights, legislation or code of canon and the commissions on judicial performance ignore it all. The legal BAR is useless and involved. We have allowed lawyers to weaponize our courts to steal, rob, extort money by forcing innocent parties into courts where the playing field is fixed (the judge is bribed to approve anything one side asks for and deny everything from the other). This is so common, it’s the norm. The only thing the public gets are fact terms “Justice, honor, oath, law, rights or due process”. We are dealing with the “Fox guarding the hen house” trusting lawyers to govern themselves, control their friend and associates, many who went to law school together. The judges hide behind a false image of good, protector or fair judge the ”Wolf in sheep’s clothing”” scam is taking place here. CLICK HERE OR THE IMAGES TO GO TO THE DATABASE It’s simple, safe and quick. Records can be changed if needed via using the email you provide. This is NOT about providing your actual physical address, instead only to count court victims in each state and county. Email newsletter will be sent with news of protests, changes, legislation and court victims in your area. You have the option to not receive the newsletters.   Read More

QUICK EASY SHARE OPTIONS PRESS + FOR MORE

Support this Bill to GET JUSTICE for ALL COURT VICTIMS Nationwide

  By , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Support this Dr Richard I Fine Los Angeles County California Corrupt Members ignores judicial corruption victims

History of SBX 211 and AB 2960 SBX 2 11 Commencing in the mid to late 1980s California Counties and State Superior Courts began paying State Superior Court judges (Trial Court judges) payments in addition to their State Compensation. These payments were called “Supplemental or Local Judicial Benefit Payments” (payments). California Constitution, Article VI, Section 19, required Judicial State Compensation could only be set by the California Legislature. The payments were held to violate the California Constitution in Sturgeon v. County of Los Angeles, 167 Cal.App.4th 630 (2008), Review Denied, 2009). In response, the California Legislature approved and Governor Schwarzenegger signed SBX 2 11 on February 20, 2009, Effective May 20, 2009: (1) allowing the payments to continue in Section 2 and adding such as Section 68220 to the California Government Code; (2) defining the payments to include salary, compensation, benefits 401K and 457K plans in Section 3 and adding such as Section 68221 to the California Government Code; (3) stating nothing in SBX 2 11 requires the Judicial Council to pay for judicial benefits or previous benefits in Section 4 and adding such as Section 68222 to the California Government Code. At all times, the payments violated both California and federal Criminal laws as “bribes” under California Criminal law and 18 U.S.C. Section 1346- “the intangible right to honest services” under Federal law. SBX 2 11 addressed the California violations in Section 5 with retroactive immunity as follows: “Notwithstanding any other law, no governmental entity, or officer or employee of a governmental entity, shall incur any liability or be subject to prosecution or disciplinary action because of benefits provided to a judge under the official action of a governmental entity prior to the effective date of this act on… Read More

QUICK EASY SHARE OPTIONS PRESS + FOR MORE

Book Rogues in Black Robes by Brian Vukadinovich

  By , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Book Rogues in Black Robes author brian vukadinovich educator speaker

Book Rogues in Black Robes by Brian Vukadinovich “… with liberty, and justice for all.” But is there truly justice for all? And how “just” is our justice system? Find out for yourself as you read how a federal court of appeals judge in Chicago used his influence to have a decision fixed regarding an appeal filed against rogue police a former judge of the United States Court of Appeals decided to come clean and disclose how he allowed himself to be manipulated into throwing the decision the chief judge of the United States Court of Appeals and other members of that court, covered up the case-fixing activities In Rogues in Black Robes, you will read about mechanisms that are put in place to protect corrupt judges from accountability when they breach their sworn oaths of office and even violate the laws of the United States. Read, learn, and decide for yourself whether there is truly “justice for all.” MORE BRIAN VUKADINOVICH ARTICLES Read More

QUICK EASY SHARE OPTIONS PRESS + FOR MORE

Book Motion for Justice I Rest My Case By Brian Vukadinovich

  By , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Book Motion for Justice I rest my case author brian vukadinovich educator speaker

Book Motion for Justice I Rest My Case By Brian Vukadinovich Rich in information, Motion for Justice: I Rest My Case shares Brian Vukadinovich’s experiences and intimate knowledge of governmental and judicial corruption and what went on behind the scenes in Indiana for years in efforts to take away his freedom and livelihood as a teacher. Motion for Justice: I Rest My Case, in a straightforward, no-holds-barred style, will open your eyes to government and judicial corruption that you have never before heard or seen the likes of. Brian Vukadinovich minces no words when he writes about his journey for justice, calling out high-level state and federal officials, including state and federal judges, for undermining Vukadinovich’s efforts in exposing government corruption. Motion for Justice: I Rest My Case will show how law enforcement agencies in Indiana conspired to take his freedom away from him by falsely arresting and vindictively prosecuting him on numerous occasions and how Brian Vukadinovich successfully took on the corrupt police in many of the cases representing himself and successfully arguing for dismissal of the bogus charges. In Motion for Justice: I Rest My Case, you will read how John Bolton, as assistant attorney general of the U.S. Department of Justice at the time, and former national security adviser to President Trump, turned a blind eye to significant evidence of police-corruption activities against Brian Vukadinovich. Motion for Justice: I Rest My Case will show how numerous lawyers teamed up in efforts to have Brian Vukadinovich fired from teaching jobs and how he took on the corrupt lawyers and won two federal lawsuits, including a five-day jury trial in March 2016, when he represented himself and convinced a federal jury that the corporation violated his due process rights… Read More

QUICK EASY SHARE OPTIONS PRESS + FOR MORE